[Bug binutils/19722] [libopcodes] [Aarch64] Undefined SIMD instruction not marked undefined

2016-04-28 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19722 --- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=4bd13cde17a27c342b79b72bde9ef8e1b5373344 commit 4bd13cde17a27c342b79b72bde9

[Bug binutils/19722] [libopcodes] [Aarch64] Undefined SIMD instruction not marked undefined

2016-04-28 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19722 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/19722] [libopcodes] [Aarch64] Undefined SIMD instruction not marked undefined

2016-04-19 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19722 --- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton --- Created attachment 9204 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9204&action=edit Proposed patch Hi Nathan, OK - please could you try out this patch. It is quite larger as it has to add

[Bug binutils/19722] [libopcodes] [Aarch64] Undefined SIMD instruction not marked undefined

2016-04-18 Thread njholcomb at wi dot rr.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19722 --- Comment #4 from njholcomb at wi dot rr.com --- This may not be a valid output from the libopcodes disassembler, but there are a lot of tools out there, and not all of them may produce expected instructions. People can also edit binaries the

[Bug binutils/19722] [libopcodes] [Aarch64] Undefined SIMD instruction not marked undefined

2016-03-29 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19722 --- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Nathan, > I'm not assembling this instruction, I am disassembling it from raw bytes. Ah - OK - that makes sense. I am not sure if it is really worth fixing this problem though. It would take a lot of

[Bug binutils/19722] [libopcodes] [Aarch64] Undefined SIMD instruction not marked undefined

2016-03-28 Thread njholcomb at wi dot rr.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19722 --- Comment #2 from njholcomb at wi dot rr.com --- Hi, I'm not assembling this instruction, I am disassembling it from raw bytes. I probably should have specified that this instruction is produced as decoder output, not as assembler output. -

[Bug binutils/19722] [libopcodes] [Aarch64] Undefined SIMD instruction not marked undefined

2016-03-20 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19722 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1