[Bug binutils/21786] Stack-buffer-overflow in {coff,coff64}-rs6000.c

2017-07-18 Thread ned at forallsecure dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21786 --- Comment #1 from Ned Williamson --- Created attachment 10270 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10270&action=edit suggested patch Here, I attach my suggested patch, fixing all places where I was able to trigger the bug

[Bug binutils/21786] Stack-buffer-overflow in {coff,coff64}-rs6000.c

2017-07-18 Thread ned at forallsecure dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21786 --- Comment #2 from Ned Williamson --- Created attachment 10271 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10271&action=edit crash state Here is the crashing state when inspecting the crash using ASAN. -- You are receiving this

[Bug binutils/21786] Stack-buffer-overflow in {coff,coff64}-rs6000.c

2017-07-19 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21786 --- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=29866fa186ee3ebda5242221607dba360b2e541e commit 29866fa186ee3ebda5242221607

[Bug binutils/21786] Stack-buffer-overflow in {coff,coff64}-rs6000.c

2017-07-19 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21786 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug binutils/21786] Stack-buffer-overflow in {coff,coff64}-rs6000.c

2017-07-19 Thread ned at forallsecure dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21786 --- Comment #5 from Ned Williamson --- Hi Nick, thanks for the great patch! It's much better than the suggested one. Thank you for pointing out the specification. I did see a crash in coff64-rs6000 as well, so that may need to use the new saf

[Bug binutils/21786] Stack-buffer-overflow in {coff,coff64}-rs6000.c

2017-07-19 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21786 --- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=6c4e7b6bfbc4679f695106de2817ecf02b27c8be commit 6c4e7b6bfbc4679f695106de281

[Bug binutils/21786] Stack-buffer-overflow in {coff,coff64}-rs6000.c

2017-07-19 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21786 --- Comment #7 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Ned, > I did see a crash in coff64-rs6000 as well, so that may need to use the new > safe functions. Ah - thanks for pointing that out. I have now checked in an additional patch to cover coff64-rs6000

[Bug binutils/21786] Stack-buffer-overflow in {coff,coff64}-rs6000.c

2017-09-04 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21786 --- Comment #8 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The binutils-2_29-branch branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=7e693dd5cede637daf4456a2a8f207be1044c6e8 commit 7e693dd5cede6

[Bug binutils/21786] Stack-buffer-overflow in {coff,coff64}-rs6000.c

2019-01-03 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21786 --- Comment #9 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=677bd4c69d0eda4f2ae635d793f23c0b1413a9e9 commit 677bd4c69d0eda4f2ae635d793f23