https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23928
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23928
--- Comment #6 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi Werner,
> Well, here's the topmost output of `bt full':
> #1 0x77dea1ea in call_init (l=,
> dl-init.c:72
> #2 0x77dea2d3 in call_init (env=0x7fffd9e8,
> at dl-init.c:30
> #3
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23928
--- Comment #5 from Werner Lemberg ---
> > I installed all necessary debug symbols; however, the very last call is
> > still shown as `??' in the backtrace (deep in dlopened stuff).
>
> What about the function before the '??'. That will
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23928
--- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi Werner
> I installed all necessary debug symbols; however, the very last call is
> still shown as `??' in the backtrace (deep in dlopened stuff).
What about the function before the '??'. That will
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23928
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23928
--- Comment #2 from Werner Lemberg ---
I installed all necessary debug symbols; however, the very last call is still
shown as `??' in the backtrace (deep in dlopened stuff). What do you recommend
to make ar and LLVMgold.so spit out more
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23928
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED
CC|
