[Bug binutils/27797] [size] attempting double-free on bfd/mach-o.c:5978

2021-04-29 Thread dkcjd2000 at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27797 --- Comment #1 from Ahcheong Lee --- Created attachment 13409 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13409&action=edit crash test case -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/27797] [size] attempting double-free on bfd/mach-o.c:5978

2021-04-29 Thread dkcjd2000 at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27797 --- Comment #2 from Ahcheong Lee --- Sorry about the wrong comment The crashed stack trace is ==14202==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: attempting double-free on 0x61900580 in thread T0: #0 0x5d809d in free (.../afl++/subjects_friend/size/si

[Bug binutils/27797] [size] attempting double-free on bfd/mach-o.c:5978

2021-04-30 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27797 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0

[Bug binutils/27797] [size] attempting double-free on bfd/mach-o.c:5978

2021-04-30 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27797 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug binutils/27797] [size] attempting double-free on bfd/mach-o.c:5978

2021-04-30 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27797 --- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=6cb40a679b23b07b9fe0c43147d300b630deec70 commit 6cb40a679b23b07b9fe0c43147d

[Bug binutils/27797] [size] attempting double-free on bfd/mach-o.c:5978

2021-04-30 Thread tromey at sourceware dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27797 Tom Tromey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tromey at sourceware dot org --- Comment

[Bug binutils/27797] [size] attempting double-free on bfd/mach-o.c:5978

2021-04-30 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27797 --- Comment #6 from Nick Clifton --- (In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #5) Hi Tom, > I think what realloc does when passed a 0 size is implementation-defined. Ah - I did wonder about that. > It may call free, but it may not. So, I thi

[Bug binutils/27797] [size] attempting double-free on bfd/mach-o.c:5978

2021-04-30 Thread mark at klomp dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27797 --- Comment #7 from Mark Wielaard --- realloc with size zero is super confusing, so much so that C11 deprecated the use of calling realloc with size zero: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/summary.htm#dr_400 -- You are receivin

[Bug binutils/27797] [size] attempting double-free on bfd/mach-o.c:5978

2021-04-30 Thread tromey at sourceware dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27797 --- Comment #8 from Tom Tromey --- > Personally I am not too worried about memory leaks. There are quite a > few of them still in the sources, but I do not see why they get raised > as issues from tiemn to time. None of the binutils tools a