http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4970
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4970
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4970
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-08-25 23:03:43
UTC ---
This regression was caused by
http://sourceware.org/ml/src-cvs/2006-q2/msg00082.html
which sets LD_LIBRARY_PATH to the newly built libbfd.so and
libopcodes.so.
Hi Mike,
the way to reproduce is:
- build/install binutils like normal except add --enable-shared to configure
- build/install binutils again with --enable-shared, and it'll fail during the
compile stages
(Just to confirm: between the first step and the second step above I should
change my
--- Additional Comments From vapier at gentoo dot org 2007-10-02 17:45
---
i think that thread is fleshing itself out such that it'll fix the issue i
raised
i opened the bug because i couldnt seem to get traction on the mailing list, but
that seems to be changing with the new thread,
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-09-28 09:50
---
Hi Mike,
Is this PR still a problem ? If so, please could you tell me a little bit
more about it ? (I am not very good when it comes to configure/install issues).
Is the problem that if you build a set of
