https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6412
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |OBSOLETE
Status|NEW
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6412
Mike Frysinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vapier at gentoo dot org
Su
--
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||6915
nThis||
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6412
--
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-04-21
21:15 ---
A patch is posted at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-04/msg00348.html
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6412
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the C
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-04-16
12:55 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> The number of object files is very large, but the number of object files with
> more than 65,279 sections is very small.
>
For people who have them, it is a big problem.
--
h
--- Additional Comments From ian at airs dot com 2008-04-16 06:02 ---
The number of object files is very large, but the number of object files with
more than 65,279 sections is very small.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6412
--- You are receiving this mail bec
--- Additional Comments From shap at eros-os dot com 2008-04-16 02:53
---
This seems like a poor solution, since the number of object files out there is
very large.
If you *do* adopt this approach, are the "fixed" object files still compatible
with *older* versions of binutils? It would
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2008-04-16
01:06 ---
I reckon the best way to support old object files is to write a utility to fix
them. Otherwise you need hacks in three places, bfd, readelf, and gold.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
