--- Additional Comments From onur at pardus dot org dot tr 2010-08-02
21:23 ---
Applying the patches on top of 2.20.51.0.10 fixes the problem for me, thank you.
For the segment headers, guess I have send the wrong files created by a
toolchain I am playing with these days. Since I could
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-02
11:59 ---
Subject: Bug 11866
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: i...@sourceware.org 2010-08-02 11:59:12
Modified files:
gold : ChangeLog output.cc output.h
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-02
10:08 ---
Subject: Bug 11866
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: amo...@sourceware.org 2010-08-02 10:08:02
Modified files:
bfd: ChangeLog elf.c
Log message:
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |ian at airs dot com
|redhat dot com |
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-08-02 04:09
---
Perhaps I was a little hasty in saying this is a strip bug. When looking at
"good.so" more carefully, I see some really weird segment values.
This one:
LOAD 0x01bce8 0x0001bce8 0x0001b
--- Additional Comments From onur at pardus dot org dot tr 2010-08-01
13:57 ---
Created an attachment (id=4891)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4891&action=view)
readelf -a for bad.so
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11866
--- You are rec
--- Additional Comments From onur at pardus dot org dot tr 2010-08-01
13:58 ---
Created an attachment (id=4892)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4892&action=view)
readelf -a for good.so
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11866
--- You are re
--- Additional Comments From onur at pardus dot org dot tr 2010-08-01
14:02 ---
See the GNU_RELRO section difference
--- good ---
GNU_EH_FRAME 0x00013c74 0x00013c74 0x00013c74
0x036c 0x036c R 4
GNU_STACK 0
