subject:"\[Bug gold\/18695\] \[x86\-64\] Missing relocation overflow check"

[Bug gold/18695] [x86-64] Missing relocation overflow check

2016-05-16 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18695 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Component|core|gold Version|unspecified

[Bug gold/18695] [x86-64] Missing relocation overflow check

2016-03-27 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18695 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added CC||peeter.joot at gmail dot com ---

[Bug gold/18695] [x86-64] Missing relocation overflow check

2016-02-07 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18695 --- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Cary Coutant from comment #10) > Created attachment 8963 [details] > Patch to fix broken x32 overflow checks > > Fix incorrect x32 overflow checking for refs to weak undef symbols. > With this

[Bug gold/18695] [x86-64] Missing relocation overflow check

2016-02-07 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18695 --- Comment #12 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Cary Coutant : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=17ecd016113c77c7fead1725d2d315fe7b42aced commit

[Bug gold/18695] [x86-64] Missing relocation overflow check

2016-02-06 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18695 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu --- X32 overflow check is wrong. One x32 gold test failure: `echo g++ -mx32 -fno-lto -W -Wall-Werror -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -fmerge-constants -g -O2 -fno-use-linker-plugin

[Bug gold/18695] [x86-64] Missing relocation overflow check

2016-02-06 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18695 --- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #8) > X32 overflow check is wrong. One x32 gold test failure: > > Cary, do you want me to fix it? You can build x32 gold under Ubuntu with CC="gcc -mx32 -fno-lto " CXX="g++

[Bug gold/18695] [x86-64] Missing relocation overflow check

2016-02-06 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18695 --- Comment #10 from Cary Coutant --- Created attachment 8963 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8963=edit Patch to fix broken x32 overflow checks Fix incorrect x32 overflow checking for refs to weak undef symbols. On

[Bug gold/18695] [x86-64] Missing relocation overflow check

2016-02-05 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18695 --- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Cary Coutant : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=44803b5d876fcbbc1c6d9919a1b763679d5c035f commit

[Bug gold/18695] [x86-64] Missing relocation overflow check

2016-02-05 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18695 --- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Cary Coutant : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=c34c98ed62f7f01fa19b1cfb174df942ee47127d commit

[Bug gold/18695] [x86-64] Missing relocation overflow check

2016-02-03 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18695 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- A simpler testcase: [hjl@gnu-6 pr18591]$ cat x.S .hidden foo .comm pad,0x8000,8 .comm foo,8,8 .text .globl bar .type bar, @function bar: movq

[Bug gold/18695] [x86-64] Missing relocation overflow check

2016-02-03 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18695 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu --- Overflow check doesn't work x32: [hjl@gnu-6 pr18695]$ cat x.S .hidden foo .comm pad,0x8ff0,8 .comm foo,8,8 .text .globl bar .type bar, @function bar:

[Bug gold/18695] [x86-64] Missing relocation overflow check

2016-02-03 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18695 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- All relocations with 8-bit, 16-bit and 32-bit fields need to check for overflow. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___

[Bug gold/18695] [x86-64] Missing relocation overflow check

2016-02-03 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18695 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- On users/hjl/gold branch, I got [hjl@gnu-6 pr18695]$ cat x.S .hidden foo .comm pad,0x8ff0,8 .comm foo,8,8 .text .globl bar .type bar, @function bar: