https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19031
Bug ID: 19031
Summary: R_386_PC32 does not imply a call
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gold
Assignee: ccoutant at gmail dot com
Reporter: rafael.espindola at gmail dot com
CC: amonakov at gmail dot com, bugdal at aerifal dot cx,
hjl.tools at gmail dot com, ian at airs dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 8652
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8652&action=edit
testcase
In order for function pointer comparisons to work when a non -fPIC non -fPIE
program uses a shared library symbol the static linker has to create an
undefined symbol with a value that points to the plt entry.
Currently both gold and bfd ld assume that R_386_PC32 is a call and therefore
doesn't capture the address, but there is no such guarantee in the psabi.
The attached patch has two functions, g and h. g will get the function address
of f using the GOT. h will get the function address of f using R_386_PC32. If f
is linked in from a .o, both return the same value. If f is linked in from a
.so one gets the body of f and another gets the plt entry.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
