https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10144
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||26080
Referenced Bugs:
https://sourceware
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10144
--- Comment #16 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-29 12:42:14 UTC ---
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by:ma...@sourceware.org2011-11-29 12:42:10
Modified files:
ld/testsuite : ChangeLog
ld/testsuite
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10144
Maciej W. Rozycki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
--- Additional Comments From aurelien at aurel32 dot net 2010-09-15 05:37
---
I have built binutils including the patch linked in the previous comment. I
confirm it fixes all the problem we currently have wrt this issue. Thanks.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10144
--- Additional Comments From aurelien at aurel32 dot net 2010-09-14 23:53
---
Thanks a lot for your work. I'll test it tomorrow on a few of the cases we have
and keep you updated.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10144
--- You are receiving this mail because: -
--- Additional Comments From macro at linux-mips dot org 2010-09-14 23:38
---
Aurelien,
I have posted my proposal now, including LD testsuite cases:
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2010-09/msg00216.html
Maciej
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10144
--- Y
--- Additional Comments From aurelien at aurel32 dot net 2010-09-14 23:01
---
Thanks for working on that. I have also spend some time trying to understand
the problem. I have also written a patch by analysing the difference with other
architecture, so I am not really sure it is correct
--- Additional Comments From macro at linux-mips dot org 2010-09-14 21:16
---
Aurelien,
Coincidentally, I've been working on this problem for the last couple
of days. I believe I have a fix ready that I plan to submit once it's
gone through testing; probably even tonight.
BTW, it's
--- Additional Comments From aurelien at aurel32 dot net 2010-09-14 19:24
---
Created an attachment (id=4981)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4981&action=view)
Testcase with C code and makefile
This new testcase doesn't obsolete the previous ones, but it's probabl
--- Additional Comments From aurelien at aurel32 dot net 2010-09-14 19:17
---
I am reopening the bug as it appeared that the issue is not fixed in GCC 4.5 as
I wrongly said here. It's just that our gcc was configured to default to -mplt
which, in some cases, workaround the issue.
To s
--- Additional Comments From aurelien at aurel32 dot net 2010-08-23 18:43
---
This is indeed a gcc issue, marking the bug on ld as invalid.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From rmansfield at qnx dot com 2010-02-26 21:52
---
I believe this issue should be resolved by:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-09/msg02070.html
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10144
--- You are receiving this mail because: -
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||rmansfield at qnx dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10144
--- You are receiving this
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||tg at mirbsd dot de
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10144
--- You are receiving this mail
--- Additional Comments From tg at mirbsd dot de 2010-01-23 18:03 ---
Created an attachment (id=4550)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4550&action=view)
Testcase #3 (with .c .s .o/.so)
(In reply to comment #4)
> Works for me with FSF versions of GCC and binutils, an
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10144
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
--- Additional Comments From rsandifo at nildram dot co dot uk 2010-01-16
17:26 ---
Works for me with FSF versions of GCC and binutils, and the version
of GLIBC I have to hand. Please post a self-contained testcase that
just needs a binutils build to run. Please also post the .s files.
--- Additional Comments From tg at mirbsd dot de 2010-01-01 14:37 ---
Created an attachment (id=4488)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4488&action=view)
New minimal testcase
New more minimal testcase. I used an external function to make sure
gcc doesnt optimise the
--- Additional Comments From rsandifo at nildram dot co dot uk 2009-11-24
19:34 ---
The problem is that the .debug_info section in thr-objc_gc.o references
thread_cancel. How did you compile that file?
--
What|Removed |Added
-
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||rixed at free dot fr
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10144
--- You are receiving this mail
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at debian dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10144
--- You are receiving this ma
--- Additional Comments From aurelien at aurel32 dot net 2009-05-11 14:02
---
Created an attachment (id=3931)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3931&action=view)
testcase
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10144
--- You are receiving this mai
22 matches
Mail list logo