subject:"\[Bug ld\/14058\] Internal overflow error, on 128kB FLASH with no relaxation"

[Bug ld/14058] Internal overflow error, on >128kB FLASH with no relaxation

2012-07-24 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14058 --- Comment #9 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-24 22:23:27 UTC --- CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by:ewedding...@sourceware.org2012-07-24 22:23:21 Modified files: ld : ChangeLog ld/emul

[Bug ld/14058] Internal overflow error, on >128kB FLASH with no relaxation

2012-07-24 Thread eric.weddington at atmel dot com

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14058 Eric Weddington changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug ld/14058] Internal overflow error, on >128kB FLASH with no relaxation

2012-05-06 Thread konfera at efton dot sk

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14058 Jan Waclawek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|DUPLICATE

[Bug ld/14058] Internal overflow error, on >128kB FLASH with no relaxation

2012-05-04 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14058 --- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-05-04 13:42:39 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > The original bug report IMO contained everything needed to reproduce the bug > and to assess it as different from the "trampolines high" case, without

[Bug ld/14058] Internal overflow error, on >128kB FLASH with no relaxation

2012-05-03 Thread konfera at efton dot sk

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14058 --- Comment #6 from Jan Waclawek 2012-05-03 22:37:12 UTC --- Hi Johann, I think what you wrote there is a bit unfair. The original bug report IMO contained everything needed to reproduce the bug and to assess it as different from the "trampo

[Bug ld/14058] Internal overflow error, on >128kB FLASH with no relaxation

2012-05-03 Thread konfera at efton dot sk

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14058 --- Comment #5 from Jan Waclawek 2012-05-03 22:29:01 UTC --- > Is using linker stubs supported without --relax at all? While it is indeed possible to "administratively" suppress this bug by disallowing stubs without --relax, I believe this bu

[Bug ld/14058] Internal overflow error, on >128kB FLASH with no relaxation

2012-05-03 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14058 --- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-05-03 22:03:18 UTC --- Here is a reduced example: ; == foo.ss == .text K1: nop .space 0x1fff6 K2: nop .section .progmem, "a", @progbits .word gs(K1) .word gs(K2) == Assemble == $ avr-as -mmcu=

[Bug ld/14058] Internal overflow error, on >128kB FLASH with no relaxation

2012-05-03 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14058 --- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-05-03 21:57:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Please re-read [...] the post at the given link. Please make bug reports that are self-contained. If there is information missing to reproduce the i

[Bug ld/14058] Internal overflow error, on >128kB FLASH with no relaxation

2012-05-03 Thread konfera at efton dot sk

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14058 --- Comment #2 from Jan Waclawek 2012-05-03 20:45:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > If you use such big programs, .trampolines gets shifted out of it's 128KiB > section. No, they don't; I posted relevant portions of disassembly in the lin