[Bug ld/16790] [cygwin|mingw] ld -v creates a.exe

2014-04-07 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16790 --- Comment #7 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com --- Hi Corinna, After some discussion with Jon_Y and Yaakov on IRC, I'm pretty much ok with moving the default-manifest handling to GCC. Excellent! :-) I'm just wondering if the

[Bug ld/16790] [cygwin|mingw] ld -v creates a.exe

2014-04-07 Thread corinna at vinschen dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16790 --- Comment #8 from Corinna Vinschen corinna at vinschen dot de --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #7) Hi Nick, Hi Corinna, After some discussion with Jon_Y and Yaakov on IRC, I'm pretty much ok with moving the

[Bug ld/16790] [cygwin|mingw] ld -v creates a.exe

2014-04-07 Thread corinna at vinschen dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16790 --- Comment #9 from Corinna Vinschen corinna at vinschen dot de --- (In reply to Corinna Vinschen from comment #8) (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #7) I'm just wondering if the default-manifest shouldn't then be made into its own

[Bug ld/16790] [cygwin|mingw] ld -v creates a.exe

2014-04-03 Thread corinna at vinschen dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16790 Corinna Vinschen corinna at vinschen dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktietz

[Bug ld/16790] [cygwin|mingw] ld -v creates a.exe

2014-04-03 Thread corinna at vinschen dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16790 --- Comment #5 from Corinna Vinschen corinna at vinschen dot de --- GCC could handle the fact to add a default manifest only when building executables If that's not clear: I'm referring to the fact that, right now, with the

Re: [Bug ld/16790] [cygwin|mingw] ld -v creates a.exe

2014-04-03 Thread Nicholas Clifton
Hi Guys, Corinna wrote: From my POV the linker is the right place to do this, and I think it would be the right thing to add logic to ld to add the default manifest only for executables and only if necessary, rather than adding it indiscriminately to the linker scripts. Hmm, I suppose that

[Bug ld/16790] [cygwin|mingw] ld -v creates a.exe

2014-04-03 Thread corinna at vinschen dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16790 --- Comment #6 from Corinna Vinschen corinna at vinschen dot de --- After some discussion with Jon_Y and Yaakov on IRC, I'm pretty much ok with moving the default-manifest handling to GCC. I'm just wondering if the default-manifest shouldn't

[Bug ld/16790] [cygwin|mingw] ld -v creates a.exe

2014-04-02 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16790 --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com --- Created attachment 7519 -- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7519action=edit Disable output if only -v or --verbose or --version is specified on the command line

[Bug ld/16790] [cygwin|mingw] ld -v creates a.exe

2014-04-02 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16790 Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ---

[Bug ld/16790] [cygwin|mingw] ld -v creates a.exe

2014-04-02 Thread yselkowitz at cygwin dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16790 Cygwin/X maintainer yselkowitz at cygwin dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|