[Bug ld/17369] The PF_X bit is set on PT_PHDR segment

2019-06-17 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17369 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/17369] The PF_X bit is set on PT_PHDR segment

2019-06-17 Thread maskray at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17369 Fangrui Song changed: What|Removed |Added CC||maskray at google dot com --- Comment

[Bug ld/17369] The PF_X bit is set on PT_PHDR segment

2015-12-07 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17369 --- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Steven, > If I pass --rosegment to gold this fixes this. Do you want a --rosegment > feature added to ld? No - if this strangeness is not actually causing any problems then I do not see any reason to

[Bug ld/17369] The PF_X bit is set on PT_PHDR segment

2015-12-05 Thread sstewartgallus00 at mylangara dot bc.ca
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17369 Steven Stewart-Gallus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sstewartgallus00@mylangara.

[Bug ld/17369] The PF_X bit is set on PT_PHDR segment

2014-09-17 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17369 Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat

[Bug ld/17369] The PF_X bit is set on PT_PHDR segment

2014-09-17 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17369 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- It just looks odd. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list