[Bug ld/18668] relocation truncated to fit: R_AARCH64_CALL26 (veneers not inserted)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18668 Jiong Wang jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug ld/18668] relocation truncated to fit: R_AARCH64_CALL26 (veneers not inserted)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18668 --- Comment #13 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Jiong Wang jiw...@sourceware.org:

[Bug ld/18668] relocation truncated to fit: R_AARCH64_CALL26 (veneers not inserted)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18668 --- Comment #11 from David Abdurachmanov david.abdurachmanov at gmail dot com --- I tested it in the last couple of days and it worked fine. Details on GCC bugzilla: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63304 -- You are receiving

[Bug ld/18668] relocation truncated to fit: R_AARCH64_CALL26 (veneers not inserted)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18668 --- Comment #12 from David Abdurachmanov david.abdurachmanov at gmail dot com --- For the record, the patch for -Wl,--defsym=foo=0x8000 fix is here (already approved): https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2015-07/msg00210.html -- You are

[Bug ld/18668] relocation truncated to fit: R_AARCH64_CALL26 (veneers not inserted)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18668 --- Comment #10 from Jiong Wang jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org --- the patch fix OpenLoop builds is sent out for review. https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2015-07/msg00137.html NOTE, it address the OpenLoops issue only which is root cause of

[Bug ld/18668] relocation truncated to fit: R_AARCH64_CALL26 (veneers not inserted)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18668 --- Comment #4 from David Abdurachmanov david.abdurachmanov at gmail dot com --- I all process libraries except one in OpenLoops, that's enough to trigger the issue. You can get it here (4.7M):

[Bug ld/18668] relocation truncated to fit: R_AARCH64_CALL26 (veneers not inserted)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18668 --- Comment #5 from Jiong Wang jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to David Abdurachmanov from comment #4) I all process libraries except one in OpenLoops, that's enough to trigger the issue. You can get it here (4.7M):

[Bug ld/18668] relocation truncated to fit: R_AARCH64_CALL26 (veneers not inserted)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18668 --- Comment #6 from David Abdurachmanov david.abdurachmanov at gmail dot com --- My last test was with GCC 4.9.3, that did not ICE during OpenLoops compilation. Thanks for looking into this! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug ld/18668] relocation truncated to fit: R_AARCH64_CALL26 (veneers not inserted)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18668 --- Comment #7 from Jiong Wang jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to David Abdurachmanov from comment #6) My last test was with GCC 4.9.3, that did not ICE during OpenLoops compilation. Thanks for looking into this! gcc 4.9.3 still

[Bug ld/18668] relocation truncated to fit: R_AARCH64_CALL26 (veneers not inserted)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18668 --- Comment #9 from Jiong Wang jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to David Abdurachmanov from comment #8) Could you point to GCC PR you mentioned? I just want to x-check why my toolchain build works. the gcc fix is

[Bug ld/18668] relocation truncated to fit: R_AARCH64_CALL26 (veneers not inserted)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18668 --- Comment #8 from David Abdurachmanov david.abdurachmanov at gmail dot com --- Could you point to GCC PR you mentioned? I just want to x-check why my toolchain build works. I will give your patch a spin once it lands, though OpenLoops

[Bug ld/18668] relocation truncated to fit: R_AARCH64_CALL26 (veneers not inserted)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18668 David Abdurachmanov david.abdurachmanov at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug ld/18668] relocation truncated to fit: R_AARCH64_CALL26 (veneers not inserted)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18668 Jiong Wang jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |jiwang

[Bug ld/18668] relocation truncated to fit: R_AARCH64_CALL26 (veneers not inserted)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18668 --- Comment #1 from Jiong Wang jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org --- thanks for reporting this, will double check the status -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___

[Bug ld/18668] relocation truncated to fit: R_AARCH64_CALL26 (veneers not inserted)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18668 David Abdurachmanov david.abdurachmanov at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target|

[Bug ld/18668] relocation truncated to fit: R_AARCH64_CALL26 (veneers not inserted)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18668 --- Comment #2 from Jiong Wang jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org --- Looking at AArch64 backend in aarch64_type_of_stub there is a check: 2287 if ((r_type == AARCH64_R (CALL26) || r_type == AARCH64_R (JUMP26)) 2288(branch_offset

[Bug ld/18668] relocation truncated to fit: R_AARCH64_CALL26 (veneers not inserted)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18668 Jiong Wang jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --

[Bug ld/18668] relocation truncated to fit: R_AARCH64_CALL26 (veneers not inserted)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18668 --- Comment #3 from David Abdurachmanov david.abdurachmanov at gmail dot com --- OpenLoops are suffering from another issue -- the offset between load instruction and constant pool is above 1MB boundary. Yes, you cannot have huge functions in