https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19623
winter-...@bfw-online.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i586-pc-sco3.2v4.2
--
You
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19623
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19623
--- Comment #2 from winter-...@bfw-online.de ---
Hi Nick,
so it is quite hard to make up the scenario as one needs to design a COFF
structure just like the problematic one. Maybe debugging the linker can resolve
this more quickly.
While debug
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19623
--- Comment #3 from winter-...@bfw-online.de ---
Created attachment 9034
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9034&action=edit
gdb session with ld
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19623
--- Comment #4 from winter-...@bfw-online.de ---
Reading further in the source code (and guessing a lot) maybe the we have a
section named A with VMA = 0 which means it requires no immediate relocation.
Later on when the linker adds new object
