https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20030
Christophe Monat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20030
--- Comment #12 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The binutils-2_26-branch branch has been updated by Christophe Lyon
:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20030
--- Comment #11 from Christophe Monat ---
Hi Nick,
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #8)
> Patch approved - please apply.
Thanks for your approval, Christophe Lyon has applied it.
As it is a bug which is also present in 2_26, would
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20030
--- Comment #10 from Christophe Monat ---
Created attachment 9244
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9244=edit
Patch corresponding to final patch created on top of
origin/binutils-2_26-branch
Patch created on top of
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20030
--- Comment #9 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Christophe Lyon :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=9239bbd3a6bf901dba1c0170622c50c78f6d1096
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20030
--- Comment #8 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi Christophe,
Patch approved - please apply.
Cheers
Nick
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20030
--- Comment #7 from Christophe Monat ---
Created attachment 9236
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9236=edit
ChangeLog contribution corresponding to the updated patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20030
Christophe Monat changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||christophe.monat at st dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20030
--- Comment #5 from Christophe Monat ---
Hi Nick,
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #4)
> Would it be OK if you created the final draft of the patch ? I have just
> started working on an x86 bug...
Yes, I agree to propose a draft for
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20030
--- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi Christophe,
> Thanks for this, it looks good, but I am seeing that the DP registers are
> grouped by pairs whereas they could be group by four,
True - there must be a bug in my arithmetic somewhere.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20030
--- Comment #3 from Christophe Monat ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #1)
Hi Nick,
> Will something like this do ?
Thanks for this, it looks good, but I am seeing that the DP registers are
grouped by pairs whereas they could be
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20030
--- Comment #2 from Christophe Monat ---
Created attachment 9234
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9234=edit
Alternate patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20030
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20030
Christophe Monat changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||laurent.alfonsi at st dot com
--
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20030
Christophe Monat changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||christophe.lyon at st dot com
--
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20030
Christophe Monat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
16 matches
Mail list logo