[Bug ld/2721] --as-needed vs. DT_NEEDED undef symbols checks

2006-06-05 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2006-06-05 13:19 --- Fixed mainline with http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils-cvs/2006-06/msg00018.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2721 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You

[Bug ld/2721] --as-needed vs. DT_NEEDED undef symbols checks

2006-06-01 Thread jakub at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From jakub at redhat dot com 2006-06-01 13:40 --- Oops, actually, swap the order of libfoo.so and libbar.so on the last command line and then it is a regression from older binutils (e.g. 2.16.91.0.6 20060212). echo 'int foo1;' | gcc -shared -fpic -o

[Bug ld/2721] --as-needed vs. DT_NEEDED undef symbols checks

2006-06-01 Thread jakub at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From jakub at redhat dot com 2006-06-01 15:34 --- http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2006-06/msg9.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2721 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or