https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31158
--- Comment #3 from Alan Modra ---
I would say it's a minor bug that x2 is not removed along with y2. I don't
care to fix that though.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31158
--- Comment #2 from Fangrui Song ---
Interesting. BFD's behavior depends on whether the assigned symbol is
referenced.
Let's enhance the test.
cat > a.s < a.t
as a.s -o a.o
ld.lld --gc-sections a.o a.t -o a.lld
ld.bfd --gc-sections a.o a.t
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31158
--- Comment #1 from Alan Modra ---
(In reply to Fangrui Song from comment #0)
> Perhaps gold and lld's behavior make more sense?
No. There is no use of x or bar in your testcase.
If you change it to
cat > a.s < a.t
ld.bfd --gc-sections a.o
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31158
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sam at gentoo dot org
--
You are
