--
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||5755
nThis||
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5303
--
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2008-02-12
00:34 ---
As of
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2008-02/msg00052.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2008-02/msg00053.html
BFD no longer uses splay-tree.c, so this is no longer a ld bug.
--
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-02-09
16:22 ---
A patch is posted at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-02/msg00068.html
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5303
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the C
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-11-14 16:31 ---
2 patches are posted at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-11/msg00145.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-11/msg00158.html
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5303
--- You are recei
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-11-13 17:19 ---
A patch is posted at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-11/msg00135.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-11-10 00:01 ---
One way to fix it is to provide both long and long long interfaces for
splay-tree with the old interface as default. Applications can choose which
one to use. We can skip the long long one if compiler doesn't support
l
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-11-09 20:54 ---
Created an attachment (id=2083)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2083&action=view)
This patch works for me.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5303
--- You are receiving t
