[Bug ld/5552] Wrong data address after linking

2008-01-08 Thread markus dot heigl at fme dot fujitsu dot com
--- Additional Comments From markus dot heigl at fme dot fujitsu dot com 2008-01-08 13:17 --- Created an attachment (id=2183) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2183action=view) testcase -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5552 --- You are

[Bug ld/5552] Wrong data address after linking

2008-01-08 Thread markus dot heigl at fme dot fujitsu dot com
--- Additional Comments From markus dot heigl at fme dot fujitsu dot com 2008-01-08 13:18 --- Created an attachment (id=2184) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2184action=view) assembler output -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5552 --- You

[Bug ld/5552] Wrong data address after linking

2008-01-08 Thread markus dot heigl at fme dot fujitsu dot com
--- Additional Comments From markus dot heigl at fme dot fujitsu dot com 2008-01-08 13:18 --- Created an attachment (id=2185) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2185action=view) linker output -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5552 --- You are

[Bug ld/5552] Wrong data address after linking

2008-01-08 Thread schwab at suse dot de
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2008-01-08 13:55 --- The assembler output is already broken. foo.o: file format elf32-fr30 RELOCATION RECORDS FOR [.data]: OFFSET TYPE VALUE 0004 R_FR30_32 foo+0x0004 0008 R_FR30_32

[Bug ld/5552] Wrong data address after linking

2008-01-08 Thread markus dot heigl at fme dot fujitsu dot com
--- Additional Comments From markus dot heigl at fme dot fujitsu dot com 2008-01-08 13:44 --- For a2.out I removed h-root.u.def.value *** /fme/users/mhaigl/essen-gcc/binutils-2.18/bfd/elf-bfd.h 2008-01-08 14:36:57.0 +0100 ---

[Bug ld/5552] Wrong data address after linking

2008-01-08 Thread markus dot heigl at fme dot fujitsu dot com
--- Additional Comments From markus dot heigl at fme dot fujitsu dot com 2008-01-08 17:17 --- So should this one be moved to gas or should I open a new one and we close this bug? -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5552 --- You are receiving this mail because: