https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30588
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab ---
They should probably by moved to libiberty.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30588
--- Comment #3 from Indu Bhagat ---
(In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #2)
> (In reply to Indu Bhagat from comment #1)
> > What is the incentive to support --disable-libsframe ?
>
> I have no need for it.
>
> libsframe has a source depende
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30588
--- Comment #2 from Tom Tromey ---
(In reply to Indu Bhagat from comment #1)
> What is the incentive to support --disable-libsframe ?
I have no need for it.
libsframe has a source dependency on libctf.
So perhaps if libsframe is going to be
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30588
--- Comment #1 from Indu Bhagat ---
What is the incentive to support --disable-libsframe ?
Currently, the GNU ld, objdump, readelf use libsframe to read/write/dump SFrame
data.
Thinking aloud about this would imply. The SFrame section (.sfra
