On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 09:06:07AM -0600, Brad Mouring wrote:
> Granted, I did not directly call ld, but rather provided them to be
> passed. If direct invocation is not reproducing the problem, it seems
> this may be a problem with gcc or my use of gcc
Yes, looks like collect2 is eating --{no-
Alan Modra wrote on 01/10/2011 07:02:51 PM:
> From: Alan Modra
> To: Brad Mouring
> Cc: bug-binutils@gnu.org
> Date: 01/10/2011 07:03 PM
> Subject: Re: [bug-binutils] Inconsistencies in symbol mapping outputfrom
'ld'
>
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:26:42AM -0600, Brad Mouring wrote:
> > Using
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:26:42AM -0600, Brad Mouring wrote:
> Using a couple of different toolchains (the default x86 2.20.1 ld
> installed in Ubuntu and clones, a pre-built third-party ARM cross compile
> toolchain's 2.19.51) results in the same, inconsistent behavior regarding
> outputting s
Using a couple of different toolchains (the default x86 2.20.1 ld
installed in Ubuntu and clones, a pre-built third-party ARM cross compile
toolchain's 2.19.51) results in the same, inconsistent behavior regarding
outputting symbol mapping information.
Basically, when I pass -M to ls, it behave
