> On 17 Dec 2018, at 19:09, Frank Heckenbach wrote:
[Note: you don't cc me, only others, for some reason.]
>>> On 17 Dec 2018, at 18:37, Frank Heckenbach wrote:
>>>
>>> Do you actually use Bison's variant? Otherwise, what you do is
>>> irrelevant here (sorry), as this is a proposal specifica
Hans Åberg wrote:
> > On 17 Dec 2018, at 18:37, Frank Heckenbach wrote:
> >
> > Do you actually use Bison's variant? Otherwise, what you do is
> > irrelevant here (sorry), as this is a proposal specifically about
> > Bison's variant.
>
> As I said, I do not use it now, but I wanted to know whet
> On 17 Dec 2018, at 18:37, Frank Heckenbach wrote:
>
> Do you actually use Bison's variant? Otherwise, what you do is
> irrelevant here (sorry), as this is a proposal specifically about
> Bison's variant.
As I said, I do not use it now, but I wanted to know whether I could use it
before actu
Hans Åberg wrote:
> > What I suggest to add (without changing the above), is:
> >
> > symbol_type make_symbol (token_type type);
> > // checks at runtime that type is V_FOO or V_BAR
> >
> > symbol_type make_symbol (token_type type, int &&);
> > // checks at runtime that type is I_BAZ or I_QU
> On 17 Dec 2018, at 11:17, Frank Heckenbach wrote:
>
> Hans Åberg wrote:
>
>>> On 17 Dec 2018, at 10:48, Frank Heckenbach wrote:
>>
>> Might Bison generate a function with a switch statement, generate the right
>> return for the lexer to use?
>
> Different semantic types need separate fun
Hans Åberg wrote:
> > On 17 Dec 2018, at 10:48, Frank Heckenbach wrote:
> >
> > I think we agree here, and that was actually my concern when I
> > started this thread. I don't want to have to write a separate case
> > for each token kind in my lexer. Of course, we need a separate case
> > for ea
> On 17 Dec 2018, at 10:48, Frank Heckenbach wrote:
>
> Hans Åberg wrote:
>
>>> On 16 Dec 2018, at 15:48, Frank Heckenbach wrote:
>>>
>>> Hans Åberg wrote:
>>>
The idea would be that rather than returning the token value,
something that does not need translation. I don't know if t
Hans Åberg wrote:
> > On 16 Dec 2018, at 15:48, Frank Heckenbach wrote:
> >
> > Hans Åberg wrote:
> >
> >> The idea would be that rather than returning the token value,
> >> something that does not need translation. I don't know if that
> >> helps up the static approach, though.
> >
> > Not su
