on 2005-04-28, at 22:46:21 -0700, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Marcus Holland-Moritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > When the parser detects a stack overflow, it should call
> > the cleanup actions defined via %destructor for all symbols
> > on the stack (and the symbo
PROTECTED]>
>
> * data/yacc.c (yyerrlab): Move the code that destroys the stack
> from here
> (yyreturn): to here. That way, destructors are called properly
> even if the stack overflows, or the user calls YYACCEPT or
> YYABORT. Stack
On 2005-04-27, at 23:19:43 +0200, Hans Aberg wrote:
> At 21:20 +0200 2005/04/27, Marcus Holland-Moritz wrote:
> >%destructor looks like it has the ability to be this "something
> >better", but IMO it currently isn't as good as it could be (i.e.
> >it is w
On 2005-04-27, at 01:55:22 +0200, Hans Aberg wrote:
> At 00:09 +0200 2005/04/27, Marcus Holland-Moritz wrote:
> >On 2005-04-26, at 23:46:10 +0200, Hans Aberg wrote:
> >
> >> Again, this is probably a question for Paul to answer, who wrote the
> >> current C-pa
module, and the module shouldn't leak memory as the code
using the module may run for long periods of time.
Marcus
> At 22:39 +0200 2005/04/26, Marcus Holland-Moritz wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I've been using bison for the C parser in one of my perl modules for a
> >c