Marcus Holland-Moritz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does the test part of my patch make any sense?
Yes, I think so. Thanks. I checked everything in.
On 2005-04-27, at 23:19:43 +0200, Hans Aberg wrote:
At 21:20 +0200 2005/04/27, Marcus Holland-Moritz wrote:
%destructor looks like it has the ability to be this something
better, but IMO it currently isn't as good as it could be (i.e.
it is worse than my solution with regard to potential
At 21:20 +0200 2005/04/27, Marcus Holland-Moritz wrote:
%destructor looks like it has the ability to be this something
better, but IMO it currently isn't as good as it could be (i.e.
it is worse than my solution with regard to potential memory
leaks arising from parser stack overflow).
The intent
