Le 4 nov. 08 à 22:39, Sergei Steshenko a écrit :
BISON_NO_ADDED_SEMICOLON=1 bison ...
Actually, adding a command line option is better generally speaking.
This is because command line option affects only the tool in question
('bison' in this case) while environment variables can coll
On Tue, 4 Nov 2008, Akim Demaille wrote:
> > I thought about the possibility of a warning too. It seems like
> > /[};]\s*$/ is the right pattern, but I have this feeling I'm forgetting
> > some special case that will annoy users with correct grammars. Actually,
> > there could be trailing commen
--- On Tue, 11/4/08, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: bison-2.4 breaks gcc-4.3.2 build
> To: "Akim Demaille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "Joel E. Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Tue, 4 Nov 2008, Akim Demaille wrote:
> I added the following.
>
> ** Temporary hack for adding a semicolon to the user action.
Thanks.
> Looking at the code, I think the simplest solution would be to provide a means
> not to issue the ';'. It then suffices that one person tries to build wi
Le 4 nov. 08 à 22:09, Akim Demaille a écrit :
Yes, sorry, I did not realize that was ambiguous. I'm doing it now.
I added the following.
** Temporary hack for adding a semicolon to the user action.
Bison used to prepend a trailing semicolon at the end of the user
action for reductions
Le 4 nov. 08 à 22:02, Joel E. Denny a écrit :
On Tue, 4 Nov 2008, Akim Demaille wrote:
Alternatively, we could just formally deprecate it in NEWS now and
then
drop support as soon as it gets in the way of other languages.
NEWS should warn about this now.
I didn't find it... except for -
On Tue, 4 Nov 2008, Akim Demaille wrote:
> > Alternatively, we could just formally deprecate it in NEWS now and then
> > drop support as soon as it gets in the way of other languages.
>
> NEWS should warn about this now.
I didn't find it... except for --yacc. Maybe I missed it. Or are you
agr
Le 4 nov. 08 à 21:21, Joel E. Denny a écrit :
On Tue, 4 Nov 2008, Akim Demaille wrote:
Anyway, I pushed the following to branch-2.4.1 to fix it. I'll
push to
master soon.
The problem with this fix is that it is very "C/C++/Java" based.
That is why
is was obsoleted and I believed that
On Tue, 4 Nov 2008, Akim Demaille wrote:
> > Anyway, I pushed the following to branch-2.4.1 to fix it. I'll push to
> > master soon.
>
> The problem with this fix is that it is very "C/C++/Java" based. That is why
> is was obsoleted and I believed that Paul had agreed to get rid of it. I'm
> o
Le 4 nov. 08 à 20:47, Joel E. Denny a écrit :
On Mon, 3 Nov 2008, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
And bison-2.3a does _not_ break the build, i.e. the
'treelang' broken by
bison-2.4, bison-2.3b is not broken by bison-2.3a, but the
Either you did something wrong or something else strange is happening
On Mon, 3 Nov 2008, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
> > And bison-2.3a does _not_ break the build, i.e. the
> > 'treelang' broken by
> > bison-2.4, bison-2.3b is not broken by bison-2.3a, but the
Either you did something wrong or something else strange is happening.
2.3a has the same bug as 2.3b and 2.
--- On Mon, 11/3/08, Sergei Steshenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Sergei Steshenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: bison-2.4 breaks gcc-4.3.2 build
> To: "Joel E. Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: bug-bison@gnu.org
> Date: Monday, Novem
--- On Mon, 11/3/08, Sergei Steshenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Sergei Steshenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: bison-2.4 breaks gcc-4.3.2 build
> To: "Joel E. Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: bug-bison@gnu.org
> Date: Monday, November
--- On Mon, 11/3/08, Sergei Steshenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Sergei Steshenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: bison-2.4 breaks gcc-4.3.2 build
> To: "Joel E. Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: bug-bison@gnu.org
> Date: Monday, November 3,
--- On Mon, 11/3/08, Joel E. Denny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Joel E. Denny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: bison-2.4 breaks gcc-4.3.2 build
> To: "Sergei Steshenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: bug-bison@gnu.org
> Date: Monday, November 3,
On Mon, 3 Nov 2008, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
> The offending piece of it:
>
> 686 expressions_with_commas_opt:
> 687 /* Nil. */ {
> 688 $$ = 0
> 689 }
> 690 |expressions_with_commas { $$ = $1 }
> 691 ;
Oh, I see. Bison is not fixing users' semantic actions anymore. If I
--- On Mon, 11/3/08, Joel E. Denny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Joel E. Denny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: bison-2.4 breaks gcc-4.3.2 build
> To: "Sergei Steshenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: bug-bison@gnu.org
> Date: Monday, November 3,
On Mon, 3 Nov 2008, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
> I've been routinely building various gcc version with bison-2.3 with no
> problems.
Thanks for doing that. It would be helpful if you would do the same for
Bison test releases, such as 2.3a and 2.3b, before formal releases come
out.
> bison-2.4 b
Hello,
I've been routinely building various gcc version with bison-2.3 with no
problems.
bison-2.4 breaks the build, the error messages are:
"
/home/sergei/AFSWD/build/gcc-4.3.2/./prev-gcc/xgcc
-B/home/sergei/AFSWD/build/gcc-4.3.2/./prev-gcc/
-B/home/sergei/AFSWD/install/gcc-4.3.2/i686-pc-lin
19 matches
Mail list logo
