On Wed, 2004-08-18 at 23:34, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Albert Cahalan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Wed, 2004-08-18 at 13:49, Paul Eggert wrote:
> >> Albert Cahalan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> > Well, so does the --lines option.
> >>
> >> No, that uses an allowed extension. It's not
Albert Cahalan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 2004-08-18 at 13:49, Paul Eggert wrote:
>> Albert Cahalan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > Well, so does the --lines option.
>>
>> No, that uses an allowed extension. It's not prohibited, the way that
>> multi-digit options are prohibited.
On Wed, 2004-08-18 at 13:49, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Albert Cahalan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Well, so does the --lines option.
>
> No, that uses an allowed extension. It's not prohibited, the way that
> multi-digit options are prohibited.
Where? You can have a "-W lines=42" option.
Guide
On Wed, 2004-08-18 at 11:44, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Albert Cahalan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > a POSIX-conforming "head" program may
> > support a "-1" option. It may also support a
> > "-2" option, and so on.
>
> That violates POSIX Utility Syntax Guidelines 3 and 11. See:
>
> http://www.o
I installed this documentation to clarify how "printf" behave.
2004-08-18 Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* coreutils.texi (printf invocation): Clarify how "printf" is
supposed to work with extra arguments, missing arguments, etc.
Index: coreutils.texi
=
Albert Cahalan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, so does the --lines option.
No, that uses an allowed extension. It's not prohibited, the way that
multi-digit options are prohibited.
> I think "violates" is too strong of a word for
> anything called "Guidelines", but anyway...
The standard s
Hmm... I'm quite sure that I didn't send this email. Unless I somehow
managed todo that by accident...
___
Bug-coreutils mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
And check that you (the OP) have debugging symbols in su and/or libc,
otherwise anything that gdb will say will be useles.
___
Bug-coreutils mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
___
Bug-coreutils mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
This looks more like a bug with your password database than with "su".
If it is an "su" bug, please try to figure out what went wrong by
using GDB on your copy of "su". (You might start by making sure
you're using coreutils "su", and which version it is: my impression is
that most people use some
Albert Cahalan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> a POSIX-conforming "head" program may
> support a "-1" option. It may also support a
> "-2" option, and so on.
That violates POSIX Utility Syntax Guidelines 3 and 11. See:
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/95399/basedefs/xbd_chap12.html#tag_12_
Dear Reader!
I recently had to change user mare's user id. This has also been done
for all his files's owner tags. After this su doesn't work properly
anymore for any user except for root. It accepts correct passwords and
waits after typing wrong passwords, but it never logs in the specified
us
12 matches
Mail list logo
