Re: dired-move-to-filename-regexp

2004-09-25 Thread Richard Stallman
Ideally ls would accept a new --format=FMT option that would work like find's printf format string. Then it'd be easy to add a new option to make ls use a format string with fixed widths to restore the old behavior. Would you like to implement that? If that's the solution you pref

Re: dired-move-to-filename-regexp

2004-09-25 Thread Richard Stallman
> That would be rather unreliable, since it would need to figure out the > number of spaces between fields in both the new output and the old > buffer. The gains that we got from --dired would be lost. > I won't accept this approach. Of course, the filename part would be deter

Re: dired-move-to-filename-regexp

2004-09-25 Thread Stefan
>> That would be rather unreliable, since it would need to figure out the >> number of spaces between fields in both the new output and the old >> buffer. The gains that we got from --dired would be lost. >> I won't accept this approach. > Of course, the filename part would be determined just

Possible bug in join (coreutils) 5.1.2 and 5.2.1

2004-09-25 Thread Markus Ueberall
Hi, though it seems unlikely that nobody has seen this before if it really is a bug, I can't explain the following behaviour: dirdiff.tmp.1g: (shortened to prevent a linebreak) snip 62-rw--- 1 ueberall users 7 Sep 25 21:24 ./file1 6d-rw--- 1 ueberall users 4 Sep

install

2004-09-25 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
The following is a bit annoying when you want to install something as a normal user, but just "ignore" any set permissions/owners/groups. /usr/bin/install -c -o root -m 4755 mail.local /home/update/ams/gnu-tools/gnu/stow/hurd//libexec/mail.local /usr/bin/install: cannot change ownership of `/hom

Re: install

2004-09-25 Thread Bob Proulx
Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > Would it be possible to add some kind of a --ignore=TYPE (with short > option -i), where TYPE is either `group', `mode', `owner' option that > would ignore EPERM or such and just continue if it was specifed? I think it would be better that if one is not root that the EPER

Re: install

2004-09-25 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
> Would it be possible to add some kind of a --ignore=TYPE (with > short option -i), where TYPE is either `group', `mode', `owner' > option that would ignore EPERM or such and just continue if it > was specifed? I think it would be better that if one is not root that the EPERM er