Re: Showing actual filesizes with ls

2005-01-23 Thread Joakim Rosqvist (JRO.SE)
> "Joakim Rosqvist (JRO.SE)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I would like to see a new option to ls that works like --size (showing > > filenames and sizes in as many columns as will fit onscreen), but shows > > filesize instead of disk usage. > > Isn't this need fairly specialized? Couldn'

Re: bug in seq command?

2005-01-23 Thread Andrew D Jewell
Please clear up my misunderstanding, because it seems to me that the fix is indeed trivial. Note 1) The million below should, of course, be a parameter Note 2) I am not allowed to submit patches, so the below must be taken only as a suggestion. *** seq.c~ Wed Dec 1 23:45:17 2004 --- seq.c

Re: possible bug in du

2005-01-23 Thread James Youngman
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 05:38:53PM +0100, Suran wrote: > > Wellit's a working movie with 10 episodes of a tv-series > so it cannnot possible by a sparse file requiring only 8kb > Could it be that ext3 reports the wrong size? Anything I could > do to find out what happenes? Do stat St

Re: possible bug in du

2005-01-23 Thread Suran
Wellit's a working movie with 10 episodes of a tv-series so it cannnot possible by a sparse file requiring only 8kb Could it be that ext3 reports the wrong size? Anything I could do to find out what happenes? Marcus Andreas Schwab wrote: Suran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/ho

Re: possible bug in du

2005-01-23 Thread Andreas Schwab
Suran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/incomming/encoded$ du -h Standalone1.avi > 8,0KStandalone1.avi > ^ ^ ^ ^ > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/incomming/encoded$ ls -l Standalone1.avi > -rw-r--r-- 1 fox mldonkey 1819156788 2005-01-23 05:39 Standalone1.avi >

possible bug in du

2005-01-23 Thread Suran
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/incomming/encoded$ du -h Standalone1.avi 8,0KStandalone1.avi ^ ^ ^ ^ [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/incomming/encoded$ ls -l Standalone1.avi -rw-r--r-- 1 fox mldonkey 1819156788 2005-01-23 05:39 Standalone1.avi ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/in

Re: Showing actual filesizes with ls

2005-01-23 Thread Paul Eggert
"Joakim Rosqvist (JRO.SE)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I would like to see a new option to ls that works like --size (showing > filenames and sizes in as many columns as will fit onscreen), but shows > filesize instead of disk usage. Isn't this need fairly specialized? Couldn't you implement i