Re: md5sum and filenames containing \

2005-04-04 Thread Bob Proulx
Olivier Delhomme wrote: > Here I have coreutils 5.2.1, debian 3.1 unstable, bash 3.00.16(1) > and I can not reproduce your problem. The hash value is correct and > without the \ at the beginning. On my Debian system the md5sum utility is not the GNU one but is from a different source and is includ

Re: md5sum and filenames containing \

2005-04-04 Thread Steve Lilly
Olivier Delhomme wrote: On Sun, 03 Apr 2005 23:34:00 +0100, Steve Lilly was saying : Dear GNU, I was testing one of my own scripts for robustness against exotic filenames containing "\" when I noticed a peculiar behaviour from the md5sum utility (version 5.2.1). To demonstrate: [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: FYI: --help now warns about built-in conflicts

2005-04-04 Thread Eric Blake
> FYI, > Before, 3 man pages (echo, printf, pwd) included a warning like this: > > NOTE: your shell may have its own version of printf, which usually > supersedes > the version described here. Please refer to your shell's documentation > for details about the options it supports. > > I've

I: tee doesn't handle dash properly

2005-04-04 Thread Dmitry V. Levin
Hi, According to NEWS file, "tee -" now writes to standard output instead of to a file named "-". However, tee closes stdout more than once if file is named "-": $ env -i tee - ftp://ftp.altlinux.org/pub/people/ldv/coreutils/coreutils-5.3.1-alt-tee.patch -- ldv pgpw5D5maALtO.pgp Description:

Re: md5sum and filenames containing \

2005-04-04 Thread Olivier Delhomme
On Sun, 03 Apr 2005 23:34:00 +0100, Steve Lilly was saying : > Dear GNU, > > I was testing one of my own scripts for robustness against exotic > filenames containing "\" when I noticed a peculiar behaviour from the > md5sum utility (version 5.2.1). To demonstrate: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] test]$

FYI: --help now warns about built-in conflicts

2005-04-04 Thread Jim Meyering
FYI, Before, 3 man pages (echo, printf, pwd) included a warning like this: NOTE: your shell may have its own version of printf, which usually supersedes the version described here. Please refer to your shell's documentation for details about the options it supports. I've put that warning i

Re: nice: error in help-text about new format

2005-04-04 Thread Paul Eggert
Thanks for your bug report. That hint is removed in coreutils 5.3.0, which you can get here: ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/coreutils/coreutils-5.3.0.tar.gz so the confusion shouldn't occur. ___ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.

Re: chmod +++++++++x file

2005-04-04 Thread Paul Eggert
Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I found I could get away with chmod +x file. Perhaps catch it. POSIX requires support for that. It's weird, but it's probably not worth diagnosing. ___ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.or

Re: bug in date(1)

2005-04-04 Thread Paul Eggert
John Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello, > I found some weird behavior in the date command version 5.2.1 > date --date= >displays Sat Apr 2 23:00:00 EST 2005 > while > date >displays > Sun Apr 3 09:56:08 EDT 2005 > > Seems to be a bug. Thanks for reporting that. The

Re: mktexpk: non-POSIX compliant use of "tail"

2005-04-04 Thread Jim Meyering
Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl Berry) writes: > >> What harm can there be in *GNU* tail always accepting tail -10? > > I am becoming more inclined to agree with you. I don't know about > Jim, though. I agree. I don't like it, but think it is necessary. I think t

Re: Command "Who" does not work properly in Linux console

2005-04-04 Thread Paul Eggert
Amir Marani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am using Mandrake Linux 10. I have a problem when I am using > command 'who' in comsole it does not gives any out put. But when I > gives command: "prompt>who -a" it gives out put. Possibly your /var/run/utmp file (or whatever it is called on your syste

chmod +++++++++x file

2005-04-04 Thread Dan Jacobson
I found I could get away with chmod +x file. Perhaps catch it. ___ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils

Re: [Patch] Adding examples to the man pages

2005-04-04 Thread Paul Eggert
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > OK, here is a handful of stuff against the CVS checkout. > Is this OK? A few comments: We need to have ChangeLog entries. The programs should use program_name to generate their own names. (This requires a tweak to man/Makefile.am as shown b

Re: mktexpk: non-POSIX compliant use of "tail"

2005-04-04 Thread Paul Eggert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl Berry) writes: > What harm can there be in *GNU* tail always accepting tail -10? I am becoming more inclined to agree with you. I don't know about Jim, though. Part of the motivation for removing support for usages not allowed by POSIX was conformance. But part of it, t

md5sum and filenames containing \

2005-04-04 Thread Steve Lilly
Dear GNU, I was testing one of my own scripts for robustness against exotic filenames containing "\" when I noticed a peculiar behaviour from the md5sum utility (version 5.2.1). To demonstrate: [EMAIL PROTECTED] test]$ touch test\\test [EMAIL PROTECTED] test]$ ls test\test [EMAIL PROTECTED] test

Re: dd hangs with SIGINT

2005-04-04 Thread Guillaume Chazarain
Paul Eggert wrote: Guillaume Chazarain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: With recent linux distributions (using NPTL), dd can hang waiting on a futex when being killed. I'm not quite sure how to parse that, but it sounds like a problem with some part of the system other than "dd", not with "dd" i

nice: error in help-text about new format

2005-04-04 Thread Baard Ove KOPPERUD
First let me thank you for your hard work and all your excellent commands and utilities. I would like to report a bug regarding the 'nice' command. I'm using: => nice (GNU coreutils) 5.2.1 I've noticed that your fazing-out the old way of specifying values for several commands (like 'nice', 'tail' a

bug in date(1)

2005-04-04 Thread John Adams
Hello, I found some weird behavior in the date command version 5.2.1 date --date= displays Sat Apr 2 23:00:00 EST 2005 while date displays Sun Apr 3 09:56:08 EDT 2005 Seems to be a bug. Maybe a usage msg for the first instance [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___

Command "Who" does not work properly in Linux console

2005-04-04 Thread Amir Marani
Hi, I am using Mandrake Linux 10. I have a problem when I am using command 'who' in comsole it does not gives any out put. But when I gives command: "prompt>who -a" it gives out put. My point is that some commands are working and do not. Please let me know if it is possible. Regards, Amir Mara

Re: install(1) man page

2005-04-04 Thread Paul Eggert
Rene Kapeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Too bad, it's realy useful. No way to make that a standard option of > install(1)? If someone contributes a clean patch to implement it, I'd volunteer to review it. The final decision would be Jim's, though. __

Re: [Patch] Adding examples to the man pages

2005-04-04 Thread Dr. David Alan Gilbert
* Jim Meyering ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Thanks for persevering. > Please base your changes on what is in CVS. > Here are instructions for checking out the latest: > > http://savannah.gnu.org/cvs/?group=coreutils OK, here is a handful of stuff against the CVS checkout. Is this OK? Dave P.S

Re: dd hangs with SIGINT

2005-04-04 Thread Paul Eggert
Guillaume Chazarain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > With recent linux distributions (using NPTL), dd can hang waiting on > a futex when being killed. I'm not quite sure how to parse that, but it sounds like a problem with some part of the system other than "dd", not with "dd" itself. When "dd" get

Re: bug in the unix join command or maybe in the sort command

2005-04-04 Thread Paul Eggert
Robert Castelo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > q.txt==(tab-separated columns) > aa value-aa > a value-a > === > both versions 5.2.1 and 5.3.0 output > > aa value-aa > a value-a > > when sorting over the entire line: > > sort q.txt > > or more specifically: > > sort