Re: (no subject)

刘玉 wrote: > link -nologo -DLL -SUBSYSTEM:WINDOWS -PDB:NONE -DEBUG -DEBUGTYPE:CV > -OUT:"libnsp > [...] > link: invalid option -- n It is obviously complaining about the -n option. But we don't know too much about DOS systems here. I suggest you discuss this on the Cygwin list. They can he

(no subject)

你好：我在编译nss时出现如下错误不知何故,请指教. link -nologo -DLL -SUBSYSTEM:WINDOWS -PDB:NONE -DEBUG -DEBUGTYPE:CV -OUT:"libnsp r4.dll" -MAP /BASE:0x3000 advapi32.lib wsock32.lib ./prvrsion.obj io/./prfd cach.obj io/./prmwait.obj io/./prmapopt.obj io/./priometh.obj io/./pripv6.obj io /./prlayer.obj io/./prl

Re: comm: summary patch

Paul Eggert wrote: > Andrew Stribblehill writes: > > It can sometimes be coded with awk, sure: > > > > #! /bin/sh > > # usage: commsum > > > > awk ' > > BEGIN {t[0]=0; t[1]=0; t[2]=0} > > {match($0,/^\t*/); t[RLENGTH]++} > > END {printf "%d\t%d\t%d\n",t[0],t[1],t[2]} > > ' "$@" This is of

Re: text vs. binary [Re: more gcc warnings]

Paul Eggert wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Blake) writes: > > nohup - POSIX requires that stdout from utility may to go to nohup.out, so > > nohup.out should probably be opened in same mode as nohup's stdout (if it > > exists) > > nohup.out is currently opened in text mode. Let's just leave tha

Re: operation not permitted

Paul Eggert wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] test]$ ls -l > > total 8 > > -rw-r--r-- 1 emonvert bmjj 0 jui 12 12:01 testsas > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] test]$ chgrp -v sas testsas > > Échec de changement de groupe de `testsas' vers sas > > chgrp: modification du groupe de `

Re: operation not permitted

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] test]$ ls -l > total 8 > -rw-r--r-- 1 emonvert bmjj 0 jui 12 12:01 testsas > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] test]$ chgrp -v sas testsas > Échec de changement de groupe de `testsas' vers sas > chgrp: modification du groupe de `testsas': Operation not permitted

Re: comm: summary patch

Andrew Stribblehill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It can sometimes be coded with awk, sure: > > #! /bin/sh > # usage: commsum > > awk ' > BEGIN {t[0]=0; t[1]=0; t[2]=0} > {match($0,/^\t*/); t[RLENGTH]++} > END {printf "%d\t%d\t%d\n",t[0],t[1],t[2]} > ' "$@" > > However, this presumes that

operation not permitted

Bonjour en etant propritaire d'un fichier je ne peux lui changer son groupe , exemple : sous le login emonvert : [EMAIL PROTECTED] test]$ ls -l total 8 -rw-r--r-- 1 emonvert bmjj 0 jui 12 12:01 testsas [EMAIL PROTECTED] test]$ chgrp -v sas testsas Échec de changement de groupe de `testsas' ve

Re: comm: summary patch

Quoting Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (2005-07-11 23:10:11 BST): > Andrew Stribblehill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > $ comm -123 /tmp/sorted /tmp/sorted-with-a-line-removed > > 1 0 45 > > Surely you meant "comm -123s"? Yes I did, sorry. > The -s option seems of relatively limited

Re: text vs. binary [Re: more gcc warnings]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Blake) writes: > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2005-05/msg00136.html I just looked at that, and don't really follow all the DOS stuff, but have these comments anyway: > cat - POSIX requires binary input and output, and this already has -B option > to fi

Re: copyright message with(out) directives

On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 12:52:42AM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote: > So -- how about if we change this text in standards.texi: > > For more information about these matters, > see the files named COPYING. > > into this text instead: > > For more information about these matters, > see

Re: copyright message with(out) directives

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl Berry) writes: > +the GNU General Public License .\n\ > > I've never seen a url in this message before, for any program. Not that > I object, I guess it makes sense, but it seems new? Yes, it is new. > You said you found this in

Re: problems with GNU date and missing timezone handling on several debian systems

"Joel N. Weber II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This might well be more of a glibc issue than a date issue, though; > I'm not really sure. Yes, that's correct. Perhaps you could file a glibc bug. > I also find it rather confusing that date will in some circumstances > print PDT as the timezone