New stable release?

2005-09-23 Thread Thomas Hood
Hi. Does anyone have any idea about when there might be a new stable release of coreutils? -- Thomas Hood ___ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils

Re: New stable release?

2005-09-23 Thread Jim Meyering
Hi. Does anyone have any idea about when there might be a new stable release of coreutils? There will be a new test release soon. There have been far too many changes to call it stable right away. ___ Bug-coreutils mailing list

cutkiller-0.1.tar.bz2

2005-09-23 Thread titeuf
Bonjour Sa fait un bout de temps que je cherche un logiciel cutkiller pour Linux et le voici Merci pour tous. Mais je rencontre un problème etant pas un expert en Linux j'ai installé comme indiqué sur votre tutos qui est trés bien ex)pliqué. Install as root ( for all users ) : su Type

utime.h cleanup for coreutils

2005-09-23 Thread Paul Eggert
I installed the following minor cleanup: system.h and jm-macros.m4 were defining symbols that are no longer used, since the utime stuff now all goes through a gnulib module. 2005-09-23 Paul Eggert [EMAIL PROTECTED] * src/system.h: Don't include utime.h; not needed. (struct

utimes-related improvements for cp, mv, install

2005-09-23 Thread Paul Eggert
I noticed that cp, mv, and install were using utimes rather than futimes. It's more efficient to operate through the file descriptor if possible, and it also avoids some race conditions. Also, install was invoking utimes twice on the resulting file; that isn't needed unless the -s option is also

Re: cutkiller-0.1.tar.bz2

2005-09-23 Thread Paul Eggert
titeuf [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MyDownloads]$ cutekiller Les.photos.park.001 seq: arguement en virgule flottante invalide: ±1B Pour en savoir davantage, faites: « seq --help ». This looks like a portability bug in cutekiller, not a bug in coreutils per se. Could you please

Re: [PATCH] cp --no-derefence --link assumes a Linux kernel

2005-09-23 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 09:16:57PM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote: Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: POSIX.1-2001 says that link() should dereference symlinks. The Linux kernel does not follow POSIX, so that calling cp with --no-dereference and --link works as expected. However on

Re: bug in getaddrinfo module

2005-09-23 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Paul Eggert on 9/22/2005 11:14 PM: Thanks for reporting that. Aside from the missing netinet/in.h that you mentioned, I noticed a few other glitches. I installed the following fix into coreutils; does it fix things for you? If so,

utimens port to Solaris 10

2005-09-23 Thread Paul Eggert
I installed the following into both gnulib and coreutils, to port the utimens module to Solaris 10, which has yet another primitive for setting file time stamps (and yet another primitive that can't do it to full resolution! When will these guys learn?). 2005-09-23 Paul Eggert [EMAIL PROTECTED]