Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> If we remove this feature, I'd like to change things to be 100%
>>> consistent with Solaris, and to preserve the setgid bit even if the
>>> user says "chmod 0755 DIR".
>>
>> I think that is the right approach.
>
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) wrote:
> Paul Eggert wrote:
>> * tests/cp/fail-perm: Use "chmod 0500" rather than "chmod 500".
>> --- tests/cp/fail-perm 28 May 2006 12:11:35 - 1.10
>> +++ tests/cp/fail-perm 25 Jul 2006 18:37:23 -
>> -chmod 500 D || framework_failure=1
>
> ** Changes in behavior
The tests/mkdir/special-1 test also now fails.
Summary: drwxr-s-wT != drwxr-x-wT
Proposed change:
-set_mode_string=u=rwx,g=rx,o=w,go+t
+set_mode_string=u=rwx,g=rx,o=w,go+t,ug-s
Drift: What is the meaning of g+t in this context?
Bob
env VERBOSE=yes make check TESTS=
Paul Eggert wrote:
> * tests/cp/fail-perm: Use "chmod 0500" rather than "chmod 500".
> --- tests/cp/fail-perm28 May 2006 12:11:35 - 1.10
> +++ tests/cp/fail-perm25 Jul 2006 18:37:23 -
> -chmod 500 D || framework_failure=1
> +chmod 0500 D || framework_failure=1
Di
> While I'm not that proficient in these issues,
Nor am i.
But I am.
> /* Return the io server port for file descriptor FD. This adds a
>Mach user reference to the returned port. On error, sets
>`errno' and returns MACH_PORT_NULL. */
Thanks, that looks quite promisi