URL:
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitemitem_id=17427
Summary: CVE-2005-1039, chmod race in mkdir, mkfifo, mknod
Project: GNU Core Utilities
Submitted by: None
Submitted on: Monday 08/14/2006 at 06:29 UTC
Pádraig Brady wrote:
Paul Eggert wrote:
Using strcoll is inefficient anyway
Don't we know it! If we can avoid it, we'd like to.
Well, the mbstowcs+wcscoll solution I presented
should be equivalent to strcoll on any platform,
and it's much faster in my tests.
That's good to know, though I'm
Why isn't the command to exit tail in the man page?
___
Bug-coreutils mailing list
Bug-coreutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
Problem:
The check with md5sum failed (No such file or directory/FAILED open or read) if
the text file with the checksum included DOS(PC) formatted.
I am new to LINUX and I use md5sum version 5.94 with the knoppix live cd.
I don't know if this is a real bug, but I think that this program should
Neil Adair wrote:
Why isn't the command to exit tail in the man page?
tail is not an interactive program and
so will not parse commands you enter.
It is known as a filter and just reads stdin and
writes to stdout.
So if you just type `tail`, it will block
reading from stdin which will be
Pádraig Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
if (isatty(stdin) isatty(sterr)) {
fprintf(stderr,Hit Ctrl-d to end\n);
}
Can anyone think of non human interactions
between tail and terminals where the above
wouldn't be appropriate?
Sure: tail -f /dev/tty. Let's not make this change; it's a
Pádraig Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There seems to be serious overhead with strcoll on glibc-2.3.5-10 at least.
We can fix the performance problem for that particular test case as
follows. I installed this (diff -pubw format):
2006-08-14 Paul Eggert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
