Re: coreutils regression in ls: link color "target"

Kirk Kelsey wrote: > the color support in ls for using "target" as the link color has > regressed with revision 1.421 of coreutils. Thank you for your report. But the version number 1.421 does not map to any known version of coreutils. Please double check your version number. You can get the

Re: sort bug

ara wrote: > Please test the following > > sort < 10 sfdafdsafdsa > 1 safdfdsafsd > 22 > EOF > > the output is wrong > > 10 sfdafdsafdsa > 1 safdfdsafsd > 22 Thank you for your bug report. However your symptoms match a very common signature that is not a bug in sort. This would be the sort or

sort bizard behavior [was: (no subject)]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to ara on 4/2/2007 2:59 PM: > Subject: sort bizard behavior Your mailer did not format the subject line properly. > > Please read the following. I do not know if it should be like that > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> export LANG=en_US.UTF-8 >

(no subject)

Subject: sort bizard behavior Please read the following. I do not know if it should be like that [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> export LANG=en_US.UTF-8 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> cat s2 10 sfdafdsafdsa 1 safdfdsafsd 22 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> sort < s2 10 sfdafdsafdsa 1 safdfdsafsd 22 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> unset LA

coreutils regression in ls: link color "target"

the color support in ls for using "target" as the link color has regressed with revision 1.421 of coreutils. Previously one could have a sym link colored the way its target would be, but now I get "argetm" and no color. Simply reverting the change in 1.421 does restore the capability, but b

sort bug

helo Please test the following sort

Re: regression in `ls -x` introduced between 6.7 and 6.8

Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> Do you observe a similar problem with ls -m? >> >> nope > > OK, thanks, that helped me to narrow it down. Here is a patch. > > 2007-04-01 Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * src/ls.c (print_horizon

Re: regression in `ls -x` introduced between 6.7 and 6.8

On Sunday 01 April 2007, Paul Eggert wrote: > Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Do you observe a similar problem with ls -m? > > > > nope > > OK, thanks, that helped me to narrow it down. Here is a patch. thanks, works great for me with 6.9 -mike pgpPEYGgyjyBv.pgp Description: PGP