Mike Markowski wrote:
> I think I've come across a bug in 'sort'. Using the attached file (please
> let me know if the attachment is stripped from this email), I tried to sort
> on the 5th column of states/countries by using:
>
>sort -k 5 c3
>
> The first few lines look like:
>
>10-Ap
Test results on MacOS X 10.5.2 and MacOS X 10.3.9:
- On MacOS X 10.5.2: All coreutils tests pass, and all gnulib tests pass!
On this platform, perl 5.8.8 is used.
This is an improvement over version 6.11. Why not mention it in NEWS:
"On MacOS X 10.5, 'cp -p some-fifo some-file' failed while tryin
I think I've come across a bug in 'sort'. Using the attached file (please let
me know if the attachment is stripped from this email), I tried to sort on the
5th column of states/countries by using:
sort -k 5 c3
The first few lines look like:
10-Apr-2008 W7GVE729C Ed AZ
Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: coreutils
> Version: 6.10-6
> Severity: normal
>
> The chcon(1) man page says:
>
> SEE ALSO
>The full documentation for chcon is maintained as a Texinfo
>manual. If the info and chcon programs are properly installed
>
"Volker Badziong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I do not understand why this is necessary if the results from subdirectories
> are not taken into account? Or asked the other way: What information from the
> traversal process is taken into the total sum?
>
> E.g. look at the following. du yields al
Hi,
I do not understand why this is necessary if the results from subdirectories
are not taken into account? Or asked the other way: What information from the
traversal process is taken into the total sum?
E.g. look at the following. du yields almost the same as "ls sums without dirs"
- althou
Volker Badziong wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am running "du (GNU coreutils) 5.93". When executing e.g.
>
> du --separate-dirs --summarize /etc/
>
> you are only interested in the total space consumed by stuff in /etc/, not
> within any subfolders. But nevertheless du traverses all subdirectories
Hello,
I am running "du (GNU coreutils) 5.93". When executing e.g.
du --separate-dirs --summarize /etc/
you are only interested in the total space consumed by stuff in /etc/, not
within any subfolders. But nevertheless du traverses all subdirectories,
regardless if "--summarize" is set o
Slackware 12.1, kernel 2.6.25.3, coreutils-6.9,
login as root:
logname
logname: no login name
whoami
root
ssh to another machine as root:
logname
root
Regards
Mario Vanoni
___
Bug-coreutils mailing list
Bug-coreutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/m
Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> According to Eric Blake on 5/22/2008 6:51 AM:
> | According to Jim Meyering on 5/22/2008 6:42 AM:
> | |> |> No need to refer the dir by name:
> | |> |>
> | |> |> futimens (dirfd. timespec);
> | |> |
> | |> | Btw., even if you don't consider the Posix 200x f
10 matches
Mail list logo
