-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to David M. Dowdle on 2/13/2009 8:45 PM:
> clouded:~> date -d "Fri Jan 19 03:14:08 UTC 2038" +%s
> date: invalid date `Fri Jan 19 03:14:08 UTC 2038'
> clouded:~>
>
> 03:14:07 is apparently when 32bit time_t hits MAXINT
Yep, and that's why m
clouded:~> date -d "Fri Jan 19 03:14:06 UTC 2038" +%s
2147483646
clouded:~> date -d "Fri Jan 19 03:14:07 UTC 2038" +%s
2147483647
clouded:~> date -d "Fri Jan 19 03:14:08 UTC 2038" +%s
date: invalid date `Fri Jan 19 03:14:08 UTC 2038'
clouded:~>
clouded:~> date --version
date (GNU coreutils) 6.
On Sat, 14 Feb 2009, Samuel Hap?k wrote:
I think that seq is not behaving correctly on this input:
seq -w 9 0.5 10
I obtain the output:
9.0
9.5
10.0
While I think I should obtain:
09.0
09.5
10.0
From the info documentation:
`-w'
`--equal-width'
Print all numbers with the same width,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Samuel Hapák on 2/13/2009 5:26 PM:
Hello Samuel,
> seq -w 9 0.5 10
>
> While I think I should obtain:
> 09.0
> 09.5
> 10.0
Thanks for the report. This indeed looks odd, and I've confirmed it in
the latest git. But at least you can wo
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009, Kevin Ivory wrote:
Hi coreutils team,
wc gives a grand total when analyzing several files.
It would be helpful to have a command line option that
returns only the total. It should be able to combine
with -c/-l/-w to return only the total characters /
total lines / total wor
Hello,
I think that seq is not behaving correctly on this input:
seq -w 9 0.5 10
I obtain the output:
9.0
9.5
10.0
While I think I should obtain:
09.0
09.5
10.0
Version of coreutils on my system is 6.10, I know it is not the most
recent version, but I've no succes on compiling the most recent ve
Hi coreutils team,
wc gives a grand total when analyzing several files.
It would be helpful to have a command line option that
returns only the total. It should be able to combine
with -c/-l/-w to return only the total characters /
total lines / total words.
Thanks for the useful versions of core
Elbert_Gmail wrote:
> I attached the log file.
Thanks.
Next time, please omit the lines that merely show how gcc is invoked.
...
> mv -f .deps/test-xvasprintf.Tpo .deps/test-xvasprintf.Po
> gcc -std=gnu99 -D__EMX__ -DEMX -DOS2 -D__ST_MT_ERRNO__ -O3 -march=pentium
> -mtune=pentium4 -Zexe -Zom
Hi Jim,
* Jim Meyering wrote on Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 12:33:34PM CET:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >
> > FWIW, 'make -C' is GNU make-specific, the portable equivalent would be
[...]
> Thanks for the advice, but I'm beginning to think that it's fine to
> give GNU-make-specific hints to coreutils buil
Not terribly important, but I was surprised to see that
I had added this to fts (for find) but had never added
it to the fts clients in coreutils.
>From 982504452d60a87632a5a2f11d1be645e06d8346 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Meyering
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:26:14 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] du,c
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>>> Pádraig Brady draigBrady.com> wrote:
+ env DEBUG=yes VERBOSE=yes make check -C tests TESTS=mv/hard-link-1 >>
log
>> 2>&1
>>
>> FWIW, 'make -C' is GNU make-specific, the portable equivalent would be
>> cd tests && env DEBUG=yes VERBO
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>> Pádraig Brady draigBrady.com> wrote:
>> > + env DEBUG=yes VERBOSE=yes make check -C tests TESTS=mv/hard-link-1 >>
>> > log
> 2>&1
>
> FWIW, 'make -C' is GNU make-specific, the portable equivalent would be
> cd tests && env DEBUG=yes VERBOSE=yes make check TESTS=...
>
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>> Pádraig Brady draigBrady.com> wrote:
>>> + env DEBUG=yes VERBOSE=yes make check -C tests TESTS=mv/hard-link-1 >> log
> 2>&1
>
> FWIW, 'make -C' is GNU make-specific, the portable equivalent would be
> cd tests && env DEBUG=yes VERBOSE=yes make check TESTS=...
Good po
> Pádraig Brady draigBrady.com> wrote:
> > + env DEBUG=yes VERBOSE=yes make check -C tests TESTS=mv/hard-link-1 >> log
2>&1
FWIW, 'make -C' is GNU make-specific, the portable equivalent would be
cd tests && env DEBUG=yes VERBOSE=yes make check TESTS=...
and catering to even more ugly make iss
Ernesto Quiroz wrote:
> Hello
>
>
>
> I am unable to kill a hanging df process by using kill -9 .
>
> Situation: We have an NFS mount on one of our servers. The network link
> went down before the NFS mount was properly unmounted.
df state is just being held by the kernel, and it's not
allowi
15 matches
Mail list logo