Re: Ajuda

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Louco on 3/13/2009 11:04 PM: Hello Louco, My Portuguese is rather limited, so I hope you can get by with a reply in English. The links below may help you find someone who can answer you in your preferred language. > Por Favor, o que fa

Ajuda

Por Favor, o que faço para o ubuntu me dar permissão para mover e alterar meus arquivos Já tentei configurá-lo de muitas maneiras e ele não me deixa fazer absolutamente nada !! -- Rafael R. Lanças dd/mm/ ___ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils

Re: root check failed for install-C-root

On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:30:18 +0100 Kamil Dudka wrote: > Now just tested on the Gentoo Linux with similar configuration, > running the test install/install-C-root in the loop, still not able > to reproduce. Can I download a snapshot of Debian with your > configuration somewhere? Or is it reproduci

Re: nl command line option not recognized

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Emmanuel Dumont on 3/13/2009 1:46 PM: > Hi Hello Emmanuel, > > I'd like to submit the following bug: > > % ls -1 * | nl --first-page=2 A bit of overkill. When stdout of ls is not a terminal, then the -1 option is redundant. And glob

Re: bug in date-command

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Bob Proulx on 3/13/2009 3:03 PM: >> This works perfect for all dates I used so far, apart from a (strangely >> enough) 20081026 >> date -d "20081026 1 days" +%Y%m%d >> returns the same datecode: 20081026 > > You probably want to do the d

Re: [PATCH] Silently lower nmerge; don't (sometimes incorrectly) range-check it.

Pádraig Brady writes: > would RLIMIT_NOFILE be a better limit than INT_MAX if available? No, as the later code will behave the same regardless of whether INT_MAX or the NOFILE-limit value is used, and if we use INT_MAX we'll save a system call. However, also please see the patch "Use a heap for

nl command line option not recognized

Hi I'd like to submit the following bug: % ls -1 * | nl --first-page=2 nl: unrecognized option `--first-paeg=2' Try `nl --help' for more information. while % ls -1 * | nl -v 2 do works properly emmanuel dumont ___ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-c

[PATCH] Change 'sort' to handle fd exhaustion better.

This is an alternative to my 9 March patch labeled "Silently lower nmerge; don't (sometimes incorrectly) range-check" . It differs by not using 'dup' to probe for extra file descriptors; instead, it simply calls 'open' (and 'pip

Re: bug in date-command

Bas Mijling wrote: > I use the date command to find the next day of a date written in the > 'mmdd' format, > e.g. for 25 October 2008 Just a side note: I like using %F for this type of string. > This works perfect for all dates I used so far, apart from a (strangely > enough) 20081026 > dat

Re: sort order changed in "sort" and "ls".

Eric Blake wrote: > Bob Proulx wrote: > > With no LANG nor LC_* variables set the default locale is the > > traditional C locale. This is also standardized by POSIX and is also > > known as the POSIX locale. The strings "C" and "POSIX" are equivalent > > but most typically us traditionalists use

Re: ready for a bug-fix coreutils-7.2?

Hi Jim, I saw a mail thread from 02/2007 that described a similar problem (http://www.nabble.com/gnulib-getcwd-patch-needed-for-Solaris-10-getcwd-td9077211.html) I don't know if this is exactly the same problem, but here's what I see from "make check": ==

bug in date-command

Hi, I use the date command to find the next day of a date written in the 'mmdd' format, e.g. for 25 October 2008 date -d "20081025 1 days" +%Y%m%d which gives as result the next day: 20081026 This works perfect for all dates I used so far, apart from a (strangely enough) 20081026 dat

Re: sort order changed in "sort" and "ls".

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Bob Proulx on 3/13/2009 12:22 PM: > > With no LANG nor LC_* variables set the default locale is the > traditional C locale. This is also standardized by POSIX and is also > known as the POSIX locale. The strings "C" and "POSIX" are equi

[PATCH] Use a heap for the internal merge.

With random data and a 64-way merge this sped up 'sort' by 5% on our tests. Sorry, I don't know how to put multiple authors in the patch. However, the authors are: Alexander Nguyen Paul Eggert We've both signed papers. - src/sort.c (mergefps): When merging a line with a K-way merge, upda

Re: sort order changed in "sort" and "ls".

Hello Rogier, Rogier Wolff wrote: > Guys, I've been using Unix systems for over twenty years. I see that > other people manage to get their Unix systems to "talk" to them in > Dutch: "Bestand is niet gevonden". Besides that this sentence is wrong > in a lot of contexts, I'm used to "file not found

[bug #23798] Proposal to add some new free & open file formats to src/dircolors.hin

Update of bug #23798 (project coreutils): Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Reply to this item at: ___

[bug #23647] 'id' not being built on OSX platforms

Update of bug #23647 (project coreutils): Severity: 3 - Normal => 2 - Minor Status:None => In Progress Assigned to:None => meyering ___

[bug #25848] chmod fails to clear sgid bit on absolute changes

Update of bug #25848 (project coreutils): Status:None => In Progress Assigned to:None => meyering ___ Follow-up Comment #1: Thanks for the r

[bug #25848] chmod fails to clear sgid bit on absolute changes

URL: Summary: chmod fails to clear sgid bit on absolute changes Project: GNU Core Utilities Submitted by: dzu Submitted on: Fri Mar 13 14:30:34 2009 Category: None Sev

Re: Error while installing coreutils6.12

i was trying with coreutils 7.1 and confiugre and make was successfull. but when i was trying make install i am getting the following error: make[3]: Entering directory `/home/lfs/coreutils-7.1/src' make[4]: Entering directory `/home/lfs/coreutils-7.1/src' test -z "/tools/bin" || /bin/mkdir -p "/t

Re: [PATCH] update info documentation about version sort

Kamil Dudka wrote: > Thanks! It looks much better. I've merged it with the original patch. > > On Friday 13 March 2009 11:27:55 Jim Meyering wrote: >> > +This functionality is implemented using the @code{fileverscmp} function >> > +from gnulib. One result of that implementation decision is that @co

Re: [PATCH] update info documentation about version sort

Thanks! It looks much better. I've merged it with the original patch. On Friday 13 March 2009 11:27:55 Jim Meyering wrote: > > +This functionality is implemented using the @code{fileverscmp} function > > +from gnulib. One result of that implementation decision is that @code{ls > > -v} +and @code{s

Re: [PATCH] update info documentation about version sort

Kamil Dudka wrote: > proposed patch which updates info documentation about version sort (to reflect > filevercmp behavior) is attached. > > Kamil > > From 6ae36e04df4db674ab2022c12df0319b768260dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Kamil Dudka > Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 10:10:36 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH

Re: sort order changed in "sort" and "ls".

Guys, I've been using Unix systems for over twenty years. I see that other people manage to get their Unix systems to "talk" to them in Dutch: "Bestand is niet gevonden". Besides that this sentence is wrong in a lot of contexts, I'm used to "file not found". When I install a modern system, (poss

Re: test-getaddrinfo fails if net is down

On Thursday 12 March 2009 09:47:34 Jim Meyering wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > this might sound like a no brainer, but `make check` will fail if > > attempted to run offline because of the test-getaddrinfo test. perhaps > > it should attempt a simple "is the network alive" and SKIP if it isnt