Eric Blake wrote:
> [please keep replies on the list, so that others may chime in]
>
> According to Robin McAdam on 3/21/2009 7:26 PM:
>>> That warning was in place to warn of a future change in behavior. The
>>> change has now been completed, and you will not get that warning in
>>> coreutils 7.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eric Blake wrote:
> [please keep replies on the list, so that others may chime in]
>
> According to Robin McAdam on 3/21/2009 7:26 PM:
>>> That warning was in place to warn of a future change in behavior. The
>>> change has now been completed, and yo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[please keep replies on the list, so that others may chime in]
According to Robin McAdam on 3/21/2009 7:26 PM:
>> That warning was in place to warn of a future change in behavior. The
>> change has now been completed, and you will not get that warnin
Sami Kerola wrote:
> Good weekend,
>
> If you consider in-line option is useful for unexpand I could wrote
> another patch for expand command which will do the same thing.
Thanks for this. I'm wondering about usefulness to other coreutils.
Perhaps fmt,fold,nl,tac,tr would also benefit in addition
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Robin McAdam on 3/21/2009 6:35 PM:
>
> Appears to be a bug with:
> du -sH * Documents\ and\ Settings/
I'm not sure I spot what you think is the bug. Everything in your trace
looked like expected behavior. I'm guessing that maybe you we
Appears to be a bug with:
du -sH * Documents\ and\ Settings/
I'm a layman.
discovered by mistyping.
xpu...@amdxp2100:/mnt/160G-1$
xpu...@amdxp2100:/mnt/160G-1$
xpu...@amdxp2100:/mnt/160G-1$ du --v
du (GNU coreutils) 6.10
Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Eric Blake on 3/20/2009 6:30 AM:
>> $ find /usr/include | xargs grep sig_atomic_t
>> /usr/include/sys/signal.h:typedef volatile int sig_atomic_t;
>
> Therefore, 'volatile sig_atomic_t' is not a bug, even if sig_atomic_t
> already included
Good weekend,
If you consider in-line option is useful for unexpand I could wrote
another patch for expand command which will do the same thing.
--
Sami Kerola
http://www.iki.fi/kerolasa/
From ef6192da066dcf3c65bc9a672ecf78c30894ac95 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sami Kerola
Date: Sat, 21
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Jim Meyering on 3/21/2009 11:20 AM:
> Changes since 7.1.63-8e6a6:
> * gnulib: Update submodule to latest.
>
> There have been a few portability fixes via gnulib, too.
This is a fun trick to list those changes:
$ git submodule sum
There have been a few portability and test-related fixes since last snapshot.
The only pending bug-fix is the one for ls -v, which should
come via gnulib's strverscmp module.
coreutils snapshot:
http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-ss.tar.gz 9.3 MB
http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-ss.tar.xz
Due to the presence of a huge residual hierarchy in my build tree, parts
of "make syntax-check" were taking way too long -- they were running
"find" on the working directory rather than using VC_LIST_EXCEPT.
Fixing that in two rules, I spotted a recommendation to use the
obsolescent @PATH_SEPARATOR
11 matches
Mail list logo
