Re: Human readable sort

2009-04-25 Thread Michael Speer
2009/4/25 Pádraig Brady : > > I've further modified your latest in the attached. > I refactored the suffix finding a bit and also added > support for --sort=human-numeric. I refactored it again to handle some potential problems with how separators and decimals points were handled. It will still l

Re: Human readable sort

2009-04-25 Thread Pádraig Brady
Michael Speer wrote: > That's much more readable. I tacked in a size. Good catch. The size is required or otherwise one could get undefined results for some chars. > The standards do not > reference the lowercase letters you commented out, so I just deleted > them outright. Fair enough. >> Som

Re: Human readable sort

2009-04-25 Thread Michael Speer
2009/4/24 Pádraig Brady : > Michael Speer wrote: >> I wrote the following patch to the 7.2 branch of coreutils to allow >> `sort` to sort by human readable byte sizes. I looked around a bit to >> see what the status of previous attempts to integrate this >> functionality were, but didn't see any v

Re: [PATCH] build: use automake's new $(AM_V_GEN) and $(AM_V_at) variables

2009-04-25 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Jim, * Jim Meyering wrote on Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 08:04:36AM CEST: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > Jim Meyering writes: > >> + $(AM_V_GEN) > >> + $(AM_V_at)rm -f $@ $...@-t > > Thanks for using these. Note the $(AM_V_GEN) will expand to the empty > > string > > with V=1 or --disable-silent-ru