Eric Blake wrote:
> According to Jim Meyering on 4/27/2009 2:36 PM:
>>> I'm using glibc-2.3.2 on this machine, for the time being. (I plan to
>>> completely reinstall it shortly, after I get just a few more services
>>> migrated off it.)
>>
>> Then don't sweat the ftello failure.
>> I think it can
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Christian Hudon wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a small feature request. It'd be nice to have a --no-header option to
> df that skips printing the header line.
The feature is already implemented in sed:-
$ df -P | sed -e 1d|head -3
/dev/mapper/mirror_a-root_fs 51605
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Jim Meyering on 4/27/2009 2:36 PM:
>> I'm using glibc-2.3.2 on this machine, for the time being. (I plan to
>> completely reinstall it shortly, after I get just a few more services
>> migrated off it.)
>
> Then don't sweat the ftello fai
Hello,
I have a small feature request. It'd be nice to have a --no-header
option to df that skips printing the header line.
The use case for this would be when doing stuff like (in a shell), to
check the disk space on a particular partition on a long list of machines:
for machine in `long l
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:36:42PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Brother Railgun of Reason wrote:
> > I'm using glibc-2.3.2 on this machine, for the time being. (I plan to
> > completely reinstall it shortly, after I get just a few more services
> > migrated off it.)
>
> Then don't sweat the ftell
Brother Railgun of Reason wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 09:46:37AM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Brother Railgun of Reason wrote:
>> > Reporting as requested by testsuite:
>> >GNU coreutils 7.2: gnulib-tests/test-suite.log
>> > 1 of 122 tests failed. (15 tests were not run).
>> > .. content
On Apr 27, 2009 11:41am, Ondřej Vašík wrote:
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> Pádraig Brady wrote:
> Attached is the full patch, which hopefully we can push soon.
I'm not objecting anything relevant in that patch, just the tab/spaces
mixing looks inconsistent with the rest of the code in add
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 09:46:37AM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Brother Railgun of Reason wrote:
> > Reporting as requested by testsuite:
> >GNU coreutils 7.2: gnulib-tests/test-suite.log
> > 1 of 122 tests failed. (15 tests were not run).
> > .. contents:: :depth: 2
> > FAIL: test-ftello.sh.l
knome@gmail.com wrote:
> On Apr 27, 2009 11:41am, Ondřej Vašík wrote:
>> Pádraig Brady wrote:
>>
>> > Pádraig Brady wrote:
>>
>> > Attached is the full patch, which hopefully we can push soon.
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm not objecting anything relevant in that patch, just the tab/spaces
>>
>> mixing looks
Hello,
as requested via IRC, adding separate test cases for patches added
previously in that thread. It should check correct diagnostics for
SELinux context/xattrs on filesystem without xattr/SELinux
support(fat32).
Greetings,
Ondřej
From e6d3f340ad40635425a63a2edceb7c4a833e048e Mon Sep
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> Pádraig Brady wrote:
> Attached is the full patch, which hopefully we can push soon.
I'm not objecting anything relevant in that patch, just the tab/spaces
mixing looks inconsistent with the rest of the code in added lines in
sort.c . Only cosmetic thing ... but is this inte
Jim Meyering wrote:
> Pádraig Brady wrote:
>> Jim Meyering wrote:
>>> Just a heads up that there is now more than enough
>>> reason to make a new, stable release of coreutils.
>>>
>>> I expect to review and apply Ondrej's xattr-related patches,
>>> and then make a test release. Then (as usual, bar
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Just a heads up that there is now more than enough
>> reason to make a new, stable release of coreutils.
>>
>> I expect to review and apply Ondrej's xattr-related patches,
>> and then make a test release. Then (as usual, barring problems),
>> a day or
Jim Meyering wrote:
> Just a heads up that there is now more than enough
> reason to make a new, stable release of coreutils.
>
> I expect to review and apply Ondrej's xattr-related patches,
> and then make a test release. Then (as usual, barring problems),
> a day or so later I'll release coreut
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> seconds to sort 1 million ints:
> ---
> sort optiontime difference
> ---
> -n 2.75
> -h (ret 0) 3.10 +13%
> -h 3.96 +44%
I removed a redundant to_uchar() a
At Monday 27 April 2009 08:35:11 Mike Frysinger wrote :
> On Tuesday 21 April 2009 08:19:23 Philip Rowlands wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Toralf F?rster wrote:
> > > For a long time I used the command "factor" to test my system WRT the
> > > cpu ondemand governor of the linux kernel, eg for issue
Michael Speer wrote:
> 2009/4/25 Pádraig Brady :
>> I've further modified your latest in the attached.
>> I refactored the suffix finding a bit and also added
>> support for --sort=human-numeric.
>
> I refactored it again to handle some potential problems with how
> separators and decimals points
Just a heads up that there is now more than enough
reason to make a new, stable release of coreutils.
I expect to review and apply Ondrej's xattr-related patches,
and then make a test release. Then (as usual, barring problems),
a day or so later I'll release coreutils-7.3.
I may well have missed
Brother Railgun of Reason wrote:
> Reporting as requested by testsuite:
>GNU coreutils 7.2: gnulib-tests/test-suite.log
> 1 of 122 tests failed. (15 tests were not run).
> .. contents:: :depth: 2
> FAIL: test-ftello.sh.log (exit: 1)
> ==
> test-ftello.c:119: ass
19 matches
Mail list logo
