Alan Curry wrote:
> Bob Proulx writes:
> > You don't like it and I don't like it but the-powers-that-be have
>
> Who's the "power" here anyway? Who do we have to impeach? Seriously. The
> "en_US" locale is an unmitigated disaster. It's officially called "not a bug"
> every time it comes up, which
Bob Proulx writes:
>
> You don't like it and I don't like it but the-powers-that-be have
Who's the "power" here anyway? Who do we have to impeach? Seriously. The
"en_US" locale is an unmitigated disaster. It's officially called "not a bug"
every time it comes up, which seems to be once a week on
tags 6007 + moreinfo
retitle 6007 locale sort ordering confusion
thanks
Vito Di Blas wrote:
> <...>sort < aaa.txt > bbb.txt
> Cari figli, domani
> Cari figli, ieri
> Cari figli, oggi
> Cari figlioli
> Cari figliozzi
> Cari figli, pregate
> Cari figlipucci
Thank you for the bug report. How
On 04/22/2010 03:34 PM, Vito Di Blas wrote:
> and I obtain the file bbb.txt
>
> Cari figli, domani
> Cari figli, ieri
> Cari figli, oggi
> Cari figlioli
> Cari figliozzi
> Cari figli, pregate
> Cari figlipucci
>
>
> which doesn't look sorted according to my expectation.
Not a bug, if you are i
Dear Friends, in Linux Fedora10, I sort the file aaa.txt :
Cari figliozzi
Cari figlipucci
Cari figli, oggi
Cari figli, ieri
Cari figli, domani
Cari figli, pregate
Cari figlioli
with the command:
<...>sort < aaa.txt > bbb.txt
and I obtain the file bbb.txt
Cari figli, domani
Cari figli
Eric Blake wrote:
> On 04/22/2010 11:00 AM, Glenn Morris wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The following message got resent to bug-gnu-emacs rather than
>> bug-coreutils, because debbugs got confused.
>
> Well, my screw-up with To: fields means that my planned review period
> was delayed...
>
>>> Thanks for t
Hi,
The following message got resent to bug-gnu-emacs rather than
bug-coreutils, because debbugs got confused.
We can discuss the reasons on help-debbugs if anyone is interested.
(Short answer: it looks like the mail you sent had two separate To:
headers, and a changed Subject: header with no bu
On 04/22/2010 11:00 AM, Glenn Morris wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The following message got resent to bug-gnu-emacs rather than
> bug-coreutils, because debbugs got confused.
Well, my screw-up with To: fields means that my planned review period
was delayed...
>> Thanks for the report. I'll commit this l
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 08:39:26AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> [adding bug-coreutils]
>
> On 04/22/2010 04:37 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >>> -if (virAsprintf(&dest, "exec:%s >>%s 2>/dev/null", argstr,
> >>> safe_target) < 0) {
> >>> +if (virAsprintf(&dest, "exec:%s | dd of=%s seek=%ll
jeff.liu wrote:
> jeff.liu wrote:
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> Thanks for your comments for my last patch submition!
>>
>> Now the fiemap copy logical changed to:
>> 1. If fiemap copy succeeds, go ahead with the meta data preserve procedure
>> if they are user specified.
>> 2. If fiemap_copy fails and the 'no
[adding bug-coreutils]
On 04/22/2010 04:37 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>> -if (virAsprintf(&dest, "exec:%s >>%s 2>/dev/null", argstr,
>>> safe_target) < 0) {
>>> +if (virAsprintf(&dest, "exec:%s | dd of=%s seek=%llub",
>>> +argstr, safe_target, offset) < 0) {
>>
>>
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 04:04:29PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
[...]
> I'd prefer a solution like the one used in automake:
>
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/automake.git/commit/?id=dbfabdfc6521979
>
> +am__trap='rm -f '\''$(abs_builddir)/$...@-t'\''; (exit $$st); exit
> $$st'; \
> +tr
On 21/04/10 21:33, Jim Meyering wrote:
> I think we're ready for coreutils-8.5.
> In preparation, here's a snapshot. Please beat it up.
Platform PassedFailedSkipped
Fedora 11 x86 372 0 47
gnulib204
Gilles Espinasse wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jim Meyering"
> Subject: bug#5999: new snapshot available: coreutils-8.4.100-81926
>
>> I think we're ready for coreutils-8.5.
>> In preparation, here's a snapshot. Please beat it up.
>
> A few warning during tests (x86, gcc-4.4.3) i
14 matches
Mail list logo
