Stefano Lattarini wrote:
From the latest git version `v8.12-87-g23ddefd', testsuite run by
nice -n19 make check, using various developement version of other
tools (e.g, sed, awk, make, ...).
Thanks for the testing and the report.
That was an interesting one.
I've never seen it because I build
OK, this is just a silly cosmetic issue, but maybe you'd like to know
about it anyway:
$ make THANKS
GENTHANKS
./thanks-gen: THANKS.in: duplicate name: Karl Berry
./thanks-gen: THANKS.in: duplicate name: Karl Heuer
./thanks-gen: THANKS.in: duplicate name: Stéphane Raimbault
$
On 17/06/11 19:34, Jim Meyering wrote:
Stefano Lattarini wrote:
From the latest git version `v8.12-87-g23ddefd', testsuite run by
nice -n19 make check, using various developement version of other
tools (e.g, sed, awk, make, ...).
Thanks for the testing and the report.
That was an
[Adding bug-coreutils]
Reference:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2011-06/msg00093.html
On Friday 17 June 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
I generally like the direction this is taking. The point of best
separation between which code goes into Makefile.in and which into
the
On 17/06/11 21:10, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
OK, this is just a silly cosmetic issue, but maybe you'd like to know
about it anyway:
$ make THANKS
GENTHANKS
./thanks-gen: THANKS.in: duplicate name: Karl Berry
./thanks-gen: THANKS.in: duplicate name: Karl Heuer
./thanks-gen: