On 22 August 2012 23:23, Robert Day wrote:
> I've attached a patch which fixes this bug and adds a test of that code
> path. The fixes can also be retrieved from
> https://github.com/rkd91/coreutils_rm_di_patch.
>
I've made a couple of related fixes (comments/code niceness and adding a
NEWS item
Robert Day wrote:
> Looks good to me; feel free to push it. I'll be mindful of your comments on
> else-statement style, comment formatting etc. if and when I submit another
> coreutils patch.
Pushed.
Looking forward to more from you.
BTW, I noticed that your message was more than double the leng
Looks good to me; feel free to push it. I'll be mindful of your comments on
else-statement style, comment formatting etc. if and when I submit another
coreutils patch.
Cheers,
Rob
On 23 August 2012 19:53, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
> > Jim Meyering wrote:
> >> Pádraig Brady wrote
Jim Meyering wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Pádraig Brady wrote:
>>> On 08/23/2012 12:17 PM, Robert Day wrote:
On 22 August 2012 23:23, Robert Day wrote:
> I've attached a patch which fixes this bug and adds a test of that code
> path. The fixes can also be retrieved from
>
Jim Meyering wrote:
> Pádraig Brady wrote:
>> On 08/23/2012 12:17 PM, Robert Day wrote:
>>> On 22 August 2012 23:23, Robert Day wrote:
>>>
I've attached a patch which fixes this bug and adds a test of that code
path. The fixes can also be retrieved from
https://github.com/rkd91/cor
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 08/23/2012 12:17 PM, Robert Day wrote:
>> On 22 August 2012 23:23, Robert Day wrote:
>>
>>> I've attached a patch which fixes this bug and adds a test of that code
>>> path. The fixes can also be retrieved from
>>> https://github.com/rkd91/coreutils_rm_di_patch.
>>>
>>
>>
On 08/23/2012 12:17 PM, Robert Day wrote:
> On 22 August 2012 23:23, Robert Day wrote:
>
>> I've attached a patch which fixes this bug and adds a test of that code
>> path. The fixes can also be retrieved from
>> https://github.com/rkd91/coreutils_rm_di_patch.
>>
>
> I've made a couple of relate
On 22 August 2012 23:23, Robert Day wrote:
> I've attached a patch which fixes this bug and adds a test of that code
> path. The fixes can also be retrieved from
> https://github.com/rkd91/coreutils_rm_di_patch.
>
I've made a couple of related fixes (comments/code niceness and adding a
NEWS item
forcemerge 12264 6366
stop
On 08/23/2012 07:08 AM, Szilard Albert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to use the join command to join the below files, and it only
> works for up to the pair of 1000.
> Any suggestions?
join(1) doesn't support numeric comparison currently.
It should, and that's already t
Hi,
I am trying to use the join command to join the below files, and it only
works for up to the pair of 1000.
Any suggestions?
cheers
Sid
900-164.06
901-164.05
902-164.03
903-164.02
904-164.01
905-163.99
906-163.98
10 matches
Mail list logo