Hi Bob,
thanks for the reminder, but I didn't receive any message from Alan,
could you re-post it?
Maybe it went to Spam.
Is there any web version of this bug tracker? At work they're blocking
the access for all the emails.
Kind Regards,
Rafal
Sent from my iPhone
On 30 Sep 2012, at 07:40, Bob Pr
Yes, I've tried and it didn't QUIT (it ignored SysRq signal). I didn't
know about Ctrl-4 shortcut for sending the QUIT signal. After that I
had to kill the process, because Control-D didn't work.
So I'm assuming it's by design.
Thanks for your help.
Kind Regards,
Rafal
Sent from my iPhone
On 30
But if Control-4 is sending QUIT signal, why:
Control-1 does kill the process?
I've checked again and actually it's not even about the number.
When I press only: Control-SysRq it kills the process as well.
Sometimes it happens on press, sometimes on release.
Kind Regards,
Rafal
Sent from my iPhon
Rafal W. wrote:
> Hi Bob,
> thanks for the reminder, but I didn't receive any message from Alan,
> could you re-post it?
> Maybe it went to Spam.
> Is there any web version of this bug tracker?
Yes. Any mail sent to bug-coreutils gets an issue number,
which comes with a URL like this: http://bugs
Rafal W. writes:
>
> But if Control-4 is sending QUIT signal, why:
> Control-1 does kill the process?
> I've checked again and actually it's not even about the number.
> When I press only: Control-SysRq it kills the process as well.
> Sometimes it happens on press, sometimes on release.
Is your S
Hi,
Thanks for this info.
Just to explain why I press it with Control and Alt.
My Linux freezing all the time, so sometimes I'm using kernel SysRq
for the reason.
So in example if I want to check all currently held Locks with SysRq-D
(which doesn't work anyway), so:
When I press SysRq-D, I've KSnap
Rafal W. writes:
>
> So in example if I want to check all currently held Locks with SysRq-D
> (which doesn't work anyway), so:
> When I press SysRq-D, I've KSnapshot popping up. In the text console
> it doesn't work at all.
ksnapshot sounds like something that might respond to a PrtSc keypress. T
Thanks. Without Control more things are working.
Alt-SysRq-m and other letters works, doesn't kill the process.
So the only problems are numbers:
Alt-SysRq-1 to 9 (exempt 5 & 6) is killing the process.
Looks like 5 and 6 have some special privileges.
Kind Regards,
Rafal
Sent from my iPhone
On 1
When I typed 'ls -l *chr4*' in linux, it gave me this:
bash-4.1$ ls -l *chr4*
ls: invalid option -- '4'
Try `ls --help' for more information.
It used to work for me, why?
Thanks!
Wei
tag 12551 + moreinfo
thanks
Chen,Wei wrote:
> When I typed 'ls -l *chr4*' in linux, it gave me this:
>
> bash-4.1$ ls -l *chr4*
> ls: invalid option -- '4'
> Try `ls --help' for more information.
>
> It used to work for me, why?
You are expanding a file glob "*chr4*" in the current directory.
Rafal W. wrote:
> Thanks. Without Control more things are working.
> Alt-SysRq-m and other letters works, doesn't kill the process.
> So the only problems are numbers:
> Alt-SysRq-1 to 9 (exempt 5 & 6) is killing the process.
> Looks like 5 and 6 have some special privileges.
Typically 5 and 6 wil
I had not expected a response.
GNU rocks,
Cheers!
On Sat, 2012-09-29 at 02:46, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Pádraig Brady wrote:
>
> > On 09/28/2012 02:25 PM, Voelker, Bernhard wrote:
> >> David Diggles wrote (Friday, September 28, 2012 4:45 AM)
> >>
> >>> DESCRIPTION
> >>> Run COMMAND with
12 matches
Mail list logo
