bug#14226: Sort -c takes in account fields that were outside sorting scope

2013-04-19 Thread Camion SPAM
Well, I'm satisfied with your suggestion of adding -s.  I would just add that this might be something that should be added to the man page. De : Eric Blake À : Camion SPAM Cc : 14226-d...@debbugs.gnu.org Envoyé le : Jeudi 18 avril 2013 21h53 Objet : Re: bug#

bug#14229: invalid TZ and /bin/date

2013-04-19 Thread Paul Eggert
On 04/19/2013 12:47 PM, Donald Berry wrote: > Are there any plans to reject invalid strings? Not as far as I know.

bug#14229: invalid TZ and /bin/date

2013-04-19 Thread Pádraig Brady
On 04/18/2013 01:24 PM, Donald Berry wrote: > If an invalid TZ argument is passed to /bin/date, it silently fails but > prints the UTC result: > [dberry@dberry ~]$ TZ=EDT date -d @0 > Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 EDT 1970 > [dberry@dberry ~]$ TZ=foo date -d @0 > Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 foo 1970 > > It works c

bug#14229: invalid TZ and /bin/date

2013-04-19 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday 19 April 2013 15:47:46 Donald Berry wrote: > Yes, date/GNU accepts whatever TZ string you pass it without error, but > this leads to very confusing results. Paul said the "GNU system", not "GNU/date". coreutils doesn't parse the TZ env var, the C library does. similarly, the date progr

bug#14229: invalid TZ and /bin/date

2013-04-19 Thread Donald Berry
Yes, date/GNU accepts whatever TZ string you pass it without error, but this leads to very confusing results. Here again is one of the examples: [dberry dberry ~]$ TZ=foo date -d @0 Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 foo 1970 I think it is safe to say that 'foo' is not a valid timezone, and yet date returns