Thank you for your response! I'll use it accordingly.
On Thu, 28 May 2020 at 08:48, Kamil Dudka wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, May 27, 2020 2:07:32 PM CEST Danie de Jager via GNU coreutils
> Bug Reports wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I use sort -Vr to sort version numbers. I noticed this discrepancy on
> > the
Hi,
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 08:48:16AM +0200, Kamil Dudka wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 27, 2020 2:07:32 PM CEST Danie de Jager via GNU coreutils
> Bug Reports wrote:
> >
> > I use sort -Vr to sort version numbers. I noticed this discrepancy on
> > the latest kernel version from Centos 7.8.
> >
>
On Thursday, May 28, 2020 11:02:43 AM CEST Erik Auerswald wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 08:48:16AM +0200, Kamil Dudka wrote:
> > It is the underscore in the .x86_64 suffix what breaks the version compare
> > algorithm. If you replace the underscore by an alphabetic character, it
> > sorts as yo
Hi,
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 01:01:05PM +0200, Kamil Dudka wrote:
> On Thursday, May 28, 2020 11:02:43 AM CEST Erik Auerswald wrote:
> > On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 08:48:16AM +0200, Kamil Dudka wrote:
> > > It is the underscore in the .x86_64 suffix what breaks the version compare
> > > algorithm. If
A little more information.
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> Yuan Cao wrote:
> > I recently came across the following behavior.
> >
> > When using "--traditional x2" or "-x" option, it seems the order of hex
> > code output for the characters is pairwise reversed (if that's the correct
> > way of describing
