On 2020-07-31 21:42, Pádraig Brady wrote: > Patch looks good thanks. Thanks.
> An alternative could be to use rmdir itself to test, like: > > if ! rmdir x/y 2>/dev/null; then > returns_ 1 rmdir --ignore-fail-on-non-empty x/y || fail=1 > fi I thought about that, but as there's a second hunk to be guarded a couple of lines later, we'd have to remember the result of the test in a variable, and test for that there. That's more code, so unless we're getting new FPs on some platform, I'd go with the standard uid_is_privileged_ function. Pushing soon ... unless there are objections. Thanks again - also for testing, Nick. Have a nice day, Berny
