bug#61035: [PATCH] cp: improve help regarding ACLs

> Doesn't the earlier part of the --help output already say something similar > when it mentions xattr? It's OK for the --help output to be somewhat terse, > with > longwinded details in the manual. No, I do not see a word there about ACLs

bug#61050: mv: add support for --one-file-system

On 2023-01-24 17:20, Mike Frysinger wrote: i'd like to require that the mv be atomic when relocating a directory, and if it isn't, fallback to other logic Calling the new option "--one-file-system" sounds a bit wrong, as --one-file-system is for programs like 'du' and 'cp' and causes them to

bug#61035: [PATCH] cp: improve help regarding ACLs

On 2023-01-25 00:26, Ondrej Valousek wrote: Doesn't the earlier part of the --help output already say something similar when it mentions xattr? It's OK for the --help output to be somewhat terse, with > longwinded details in the manual. No, I do not see a word there about ACLs For --preserve

bug#61035: [PATCH] cp: improve help regarding ACLs

> For --preserve[=ATTR_LIST] the usage message says "preserve the specified > attributes (default: mode,ownership,timestamps), if possible additional > attributes: context, links, xattr," Yes, but that's nothing about ACLs. The aim of this patch is to clarify the current behavior which might no

bug#61050: mv: add support for --one-file-system

On 25/01/2023 09:07, Paul Eggert wrote: On 2023-01-24 17:20, Mike Frysinger wrote: i'd like to require that the mv be atomic when relocating a directory, and if it isn't, fallback to other logic Calling the new option "--one-file-system" sounds a bit wrong, as --one-file-system is for programs

bug#61050: mv: add support for --one-file-system

On 25 Jan 2023 01:07, Paul Eggert wrote: > On 2023-01-24 17:20, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > i'd like to require that the mv be > > atomic when relocating a directory, and if it isn't, fallback to other > > logic > > Calling the new option "--one-file-system" sounds a bit wrong, as > --one-file-syst

bug#61035: [PATCH] cp: improve help regarding ACLs

On 2023-01-25 01:24, Ondrej Valousek wrote: For --preserve[=ATTR_LIST] the usage message says "preserve the specified attributes (default: mode,ownership,timestamps), if possible additional attributes: context, links, xattr," Yes, but that's nothing about ACLs. The aim of this patch is to clari

bug#61035: [PATCH] cp: improve help regarding ACLs

But it's not the same meaning. What I am trying to explain here is that Cp -p (or cp --preserve=mode) also retains ACLs. This fact is not obvious, but yet it's happening Zasláno z Outlooku pro Android Od: Paul Eggert Odesláno: středa 25.

bug#61035: [PATCH] cp: improve help regarding ACLs

On 2023-01-25 13:56, Ondrej Valousek wrote: But it's not the same meaning. What I am trying to explain here is that Cp -p (or cp --preserve=mode) also retains ACLs. This fact is not obvious, but yet it's happening Then I'm afraid I don't understand. In what sense do ACLs differ from xattr he