rograms
) also recorded in ./src/Makefile.am
I saw this error contains also in v6.9.1
Any idea ?
--
With the best regards,
Elbert Pol
--
*** Take a look at
arch hostname su
But nottin seems to help.
I build v6.90 and had no problems.
I use gcc (GCC) 3.3.5 (Bird Build 2007-06-10 14:30)
--
With the best regards,
Elbert Pol
--
Hello all,
I wonder why on this question is a verry quick response, and i posted 2
times a same sort of question and i got no response at all...
Is this because i use os/2 ?
checking for getspnam... no
checking for library containing crypt... none required
configure: error: internal error
Hoi Jim, and the rest
I try to debug some things for os2 and it seems a hell of a job :(
Espicely if you have no backgrounds about the debugger.
But i saw newer Coreutils 6.11 i thought i try and the configuratie went
smootly this time :P
Then i did make and now it stops at
gcc -std=gnu99 -D_
Hoi Jim,
I used the lzma and after that i untar the tar file
I attach the log
Hope it's fixable :)
Jim Meyering wrote:
Elbert Pol<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hoi Jim, and the rest
I try to debug some things for os2 and it seems a hell of a job :(
Espicely if you have no backgr
Jim Meyering wrote:
Forwarding manually.
Hello Jim,
Sorry for the mail trouble.
I have use the test version and also send the Stat.h from the test version.
--- U:\Core\lib\sys\stat.h 2008-04-22 20:40:18.
Jim Meyering wrote:
Elbert Pol<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote:
Elbert Pol<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have use the test version and also send the Stat.h from the test version.
--- U:\Core\lib\sys\stat.h 2008-04-22 20:40:18.0 +
+++ U:\coreutils-
Hoi Jim,
When i use the new rm.exe and use it with the ./configure i get all kind
of errors like :
rm.exe: cannot remove `conftest': Is a directory
rm.exe: cannot remove `conftest.dir': Is a directory
rm.exe: FATAL: cannot enter directory `conftest': Bad file number
rm.exe: FATAL: cannot enter
Jim Meyering wrote:
Elbert Pol<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hoi Jim,
When i use the new rm.exe and use it with the ./configure i get all
kind of errors like :
rm.exe: cannot remove `conftest': Is a directory
rm.exe: cannot remove `conftest.dir': Is a directory
rm.exe: FAT
Jim Meyering wrote:
Elbert Pol<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hoi Jim,
When i use the new rm.exe and use it with the ./configure i get all
kind of errors like :
rm.exe: cannot remove `conftest': Is a directory
rm.exe: cannot remove `conftest.dir': Is a directory
rm.exe: FAT
Jim Meyering wrote:
Elbert Pol<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hoi Jim,
When i use the new rm.exe and use it with the ./configure i get all
kind of errors like :
rm.exe: cannot remove `conftest': Is a directory
rm.exe: cannot remove `conftest.dir': Is a directory
rm.exe: FAT
Hi Jim,
Curious if the log give you some usefull info?
Jim Meyering wrote:
Elbert Pol<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
Remember when you chose not to run "make -k check"? ;-)
Well, now would be a good time to go back and do that,
but with working tools in your PATH, of course
Hoi,
Jim Meyering wrote:
Elbert Pol<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote:
Here's a snapshot of the latest sources from coreutils
and the parts of gnulib that it uses. Please beat it up ;-)
If things work out, I may even make a test release by Wednesday.
I try today this
Hi Jim,
Jim Meyering wrote:
Elbert Pol<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
I found a newer build from Gmp v4.21 for os/2
With that i came further but still error with the make...
If you have any libgmp*.a files, what symbols do they contain?
E.g., I'd run something like this to ch
Hello Jim,
Jim Meyering wrote:
Elbert Pol<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
That might make the link succeed, but without gmp support in factor.
I had just little time at the moment to test, but if i will build
without the Gmp, what effect this to the Coreutils build?
Almost none:
Hi Jim,
Jim Meyering wrote:
Elbert Pol<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
That might make the link succeed, but without gmp support in factor.
I had just little time at the moment to test, but if i will build
without the Gmp, what effect this to the Coreutils build?
Almost none: factor
status 125 (EXIT_CANCELED), not errno.
From 15f4d612df8eed7014f76825ad986fb8c769ec5d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Meyering<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 18:29:39 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] timeout.c: don't use perror; exit 125 upon failed fork
* src/timeout.c (main): Use "
Hoi,
Jim Meyering wrote:
Elbert Pol<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Jim,
Thank you! You've just uncovered a bug!
Fixed by the patch below.
However, that problem is independent of the libgmp issue,
so if you apply the patch, your build should get farther.
Actually, there'
Hoi,
Jim Meyering wrote:
Elbert Pol<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
What version of Perl are you using?
Run perl -v
Then try this patch:
diff --git a/man/help2man b/man/help2man
index cbdaf06..911edc9 100755
--- a/man/help2man
+++ b/man/help2man
@@ -40,8 +40,8 @@ BEGIN {
Hoi Jim,
Dunno what happens, but if i do now build with --without-gmp all is
building ok now. Even the Help2man error is gone :)
But the check still fails.
I attach the log for the check.
If i try the rm.exe and if i try to remove a dir it fails...
[u:\coreutils-7.0\src]mkdir foo
[u:\coreut
etel
U:\coreutils-7.0.171-0dc44\src>rm bretel
rm.exe: cannot remove `bretel': Is a directory
U:\coreutils-7.0.171-0dc44\src>rm -R bretel
rm.exe: FATAL: cannot enter directory `bretel': Bad file number
--
With the best wishes,
Elbert Pol
21 matches
Mail list logo
